ArticlePloS one2017
Clinical validation of a highly sensitive assay to detect EGFR mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04229121 (Clinical Sensitivity Verification Study of Circulating Tumor Cells Gene Mutation Detection From Advanced NSCLC Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Sensitivity Verification Study of Circulating Tumor Cells Gene Mutation Detection From Advanced NSCLC Patients
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic exploration of uncommon EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: breaking through brambles and thorns.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Droplet Digital PCR and Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in Cell-Free DNA of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Comprehensive review of LncRNA-mediated therapeutic resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer cell international · 2024Review
- Highly Sensitive 3D-Nanoplasmonic-Based Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Multiplex Assay Chip for Liquid Biopsy.Small science · 2024Article
- Identification of DNA methylation and genetic alteration simultaneously from a single blood biopsy.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- Real-world analysis of the prognostic value of EGFR mutation detection in plasma ctDNA from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Application of Adenosine Deaminase and γ-Interferon Release Assay in Pleural Fluid for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion in Patients Over 40 Years Old.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Non-small cell lung cancer in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Review
- Molecular characterization of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients by cfDNA analysis: experience from routine laboratory practice.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Cell-free DNA as a liquid biopsy for early detection of gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2021Review
- Smoking habit and chemo-radiotherapy and/or surgery affect the sensitivity of EGFR plasma test in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- Nanotechnology Strategies for the Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Review
- Precision Detection Technology: Equipping Precision Oncology with Wings.Journal of oncology · 2020Review
- Non-invasive detection of EGFR and TP53 mutations through the combination of plasma, urine and sputum in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- A comparison ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2019Article
- Liquid Biopsy to Identify Actionable Genomic Alterations.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2018Review
- Comparison of the SuperARMS and Droplet Digital PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in ctDNA From NSCLC Patients.Translational oncology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for noninvasive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations detection in lung cancer patients, but the existing methods have limitations in sensitivity or in availability. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a novel assay called ADx-SuperARMS in detecting EGFR mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsA total of 109 patients with metastatic advanced adenocarcinoma were recruited who provided both blood samples and matched tumor tissue samples. EGFR mutation status in plasma samples were tested with ADx-SuperARMS EGFR assay and tumor tissue samples were tested with ADx-ARMS EGFR assay. The clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive prediction value (PPV), and negative prediction value (NPV) of ADx-SuperARMS EGFR assay were calculated by using EGFR mutation status in tumor tissue as standard reference. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was implemented and an area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of exon 19 deletion (E19Del) and L858R mutation detection. The objective response rate (ORR) were calculated according to the EGFR mutation status determined by ADx-superARMS as well.
results0.2% analytical sensitivity and 100% specificity of the ADx-SuperARMS EGFR assays for EGFR E19Del, L858R, and T790M mutants were confirmed by using a series of diluted cell line DNA. In the clinical study, EGFR mutations were detected in 45.9% (50/109) of the plasma samples and in 56.9% (62/109) of the matched tumor tissue samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the ADx-SuperARMS EGFR assay for plasma EGFR mutation detection were 82.0% (50/61), 100% (48/48), 100% (50/50), and 81.4% (48/59), respectively. In ROC analysis, ADx-SuperARMS achieved sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 99% in E19Dels as well as sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 100% in L858R, respectively. Among the 35 patients who were plasma EGFR mutation positive and treated with first generation of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 23 (65.7%) achieved partial response, 11 (31.4%) sustained disease, and 1 (2.9%) progressive disease. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 65.7% and 97.1%, respectively.
conclusionsADx-SuperARMS EGFR assay is likely to be a highly sensitive and specific method to noninvasively detect plasma EGFR mutations of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutations detected by ADx-SuperARMS EGFR assay could predict the efficacy of the treatment with first generation of EGFR-TKIs. Hence, EGFR blood testing with ADx-SuperARMS could address the unmet clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.