Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28829573›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2017

Chemical Interrogation of LuxR-type Quorum Sensing Receptors Reveals New Insights into Receptor Selectivity and the Potential for Interspecies Bacterial Signaling.

Joseph P Gerdt, Danielle M Wittenwyler, Joshua B Combs, Michelle E Boursier, Jacob W Brummond, He Xu, Helen E Blackwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Chemical Control of Quorum Sensing inACS infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Mechanism underlying autoinducer recognition in theThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural determinants driving homoserine lactone ligand selection in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph P GerdtDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Danielle M WittenwylerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Joshua B CombsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Michelle E BoursierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Jacob W BrummondDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
He XuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Helen E BlackwellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Ave., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4261-8194

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Training ProgramT32GM008505 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLACKWELL, HELEN E. · 1993 to 2023
$9.8M
Synthetic Ligands for Modulating Bacterial CommunicationR01GM109403 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLACKWELL, HELEN E. · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109403NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-cell signaling between bacteria, including quorum-sensing (QS) communication systems, may play a role in the establishment and maintenance of polymicrobial communities. To better understand and model these interactions, we must uncover the degree to which neighboring species recognize each another's signals. In the current study, we tested the likelihood of whether the QS systems of two opportunistic pathogens (Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) that frequently arise in polymicrobial infections would be affected by the QS signals of neighboring species. Through the synthesis and screening of a library of native and non-native N-acyl l-homoserine lactones (AHLs), we found that the AbaR LuxR-type receptor protein of A. baumannii is highly selective for its native AHL signal. However, a homologous LuxR-type receptor in P. aeruginosa, LasR, is far more promiscuously activated by AHLs relative to AbaR, suggesting that LasR-regulated QS could be more susceptible to activation by neighboring species. To explain the observed difference in signal selectivity between AbaR and LasR, we developed a model based on (i) the activity profiles of these proteins and (ii) previously reported structural data and activity profiles for related LuxR-type receptors. This model may facilitate the study of signal selectivities for hundreds of LuxR-type QS receptors from bacteria, many of which grow in polymicrobial communities and may sense each other's signals. In addition, we discovered a set of AHLs that could be used to selectively activate LasR and selectively inhibit AbaR in polymicrobial experiments.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAcyl-ButyrolactonesHumansModels, MolecularPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsQuorum SensingRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsAcyl-ButyrolactonesLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID28829573
PMCPMC5600713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.