Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28829418›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Microfluidic Bioprinting for Engineering Vascularized Tissues and Organoids.

Yu Shrike Zhang, Qingmeng Pi, Anne Metje van Genderen

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Stimuli-responsive hybrid materials for 4DMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A 3D-Bioprinted Multiple Myeloma Model.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. In Vitro Strategies to Vascularize 3D Physiologically Relevant Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complex 3D bioprinting methods.APL bioengineering · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current challenges in three-dimensional bioprinting heart tissues for cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu Shrike ZhangDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; yszhang@research.bwh.harvard.edu.
Qingmeng PiDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
Anne Metje van GenderenDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University.

Funding

Recapitulating Ductal Carcinoma on a Chip for Personalized Breast Cancer TherapyK99CA201603 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHANG, Y. SHRIKE · 2016 to 2017
$356k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA201603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineering vascularized tissue constructs and organoids has been historically challenging. Here we describe a novel method based on microfluidic bioprinting to generate a scaffold with multilayer interlacing hydrogel microfibers. To achieve smooth bioprinting, a core-sheath microfluidic printhead containing a composite bioink formulation extruded from the core flow and the crosslinking solution carried by the sheath flow, was designed and fitted onto the bioprinter. By blending gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) with alginate, a polysaccharide that undergoes instantaneous ionic crosslinking in the presence of select divalent ions, followed by a secondary photocrosslinking of the GelMA component to achieve permanent stabilization, a microfibrous scaffold could be obtained using this bioprinting strategy. Importantly, the endothelial cells encapsulated inside the bioprinted microfibers can form the lumen-like structures resembling the vasculature over the course of culture for 16 days. The endothelialized microfibrous scaffold may be further used as a vascular bed to construct a vascularized tissue through subsequent seeding of the secondary cell type into the interstitial space of the microfibers. Microfluidic bioprinting provides a generalized strategy in convenient engineering of vascularized tissues at high fidelity.

Indexed as

AlginatesAnimalsBioprintingEndothelial CellsGelatinGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMicrofluidicsMyocytes, CardiacOrganoidsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAlginatesGelatinGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID28829418
PMCPMC5614273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.