Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28829367›Full record

ReviewMembranes2017

Past, Present and Future of Surgical Meshes: A Review.

Karen Baylón, Perla Rodríguez-Camarillo, Alex Elías-Zúñiga, Jose Antonio Díaz-Elizondo, Robert Gilkerson, Karen Lozano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Membranes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04393532 (Laparoscopic Primary Umbilical Hernia Repair With Routine Defect Closure Using Su2ura Approximation Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04393532 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Primary Umbilical Hernia Repair With Routine Defect Closure Using Su2ura Approximation Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnchora MedicalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsPrimary Umbilical HerniaArmsSu2ura Approximation Device, Laparoscopic hernia repair surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen BaylónCentro de Innovación en Diseño y Tecnología, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico. karen.baylon@itesm.mx.
Perla Rodríguez-CamarilloCentro de Innovación en Diseño y Tecnología, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico. A01139114@itesm.mx.
Alex Elías-ZúñigaCentro de Innovación en Diseño y Tecnología, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico. aelias@itesm.mx.
Jose Antonio Díaz-ElizondoEscuela de Medicina, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico. jadiaze@itesm.mx.
Robert GilkersonDepartments of Biology and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA. robert.gilkerson@utrgv.edu.
Karen LozanoMechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA. karen.lozano@utrgv.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical meshes, in particular those used to repair hernias, have been in use since 1891. Since then, research in the area has expanded, given the vast number of post-surgery complications such as infection, fibrosis, adhesions, mesh rejection, and hernia recurrence. Researchers have focused on the analysis and implementation of a wide range of materials: meshes with different fiber size and porosity, a variety of manufacturing methods, and certainly a variety of surgical and implantation procedures. Currently, surface modification methods and development of nanofiber based systems are actively being explored as areas of opportunity to retain material strength and increase biocompatibility of available meshes. This review summarizes the history of surgical meshes and presents an overview of commercial surgical meshes, their properties, manufacturing methods, and observed biological response, as well as the requirements for an ideal surgical mesh and potential manufacturing methods.

Indexed as

abdominal wall reconstructionbiocompatibilityhernia repairsurgical mesh

Identifiers

PMID28829367
PMCPMC5618132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.