Field Trials of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes and Public Health Ethics.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Exploratory conversations with biodiversity-oriented civil society groups on the potential applications of gene drive-modified mosquitoes for malaria control in Tanzania.Transgenic research · 2026
   Article
2. Aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in mosquito larval habitats in São Tomé and Príncipe.PloS one · 2026
   Article
3. Perspectives of vector management in the control and elimination of vector-borne zoonoses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
   Review
4. The ethics of species extinctions.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2023
   Review
5. Coupled small molecules target RNA interference and JAK/STAT signaling to reduce Zika virus infection in Aedes aegypti.PLoS pathogens · 2022
   Article
6. Guidance on stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics.2017

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as