Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828697›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2018

Metacognitive training in patients recovering from a first psychosis: an experience sampling study testing treatment effects.

Karin Pos, Carin J Meijer, Oukje Verkerk, Onno Ackema, Lydia Krabbendam, Lieuwe de Haan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06127004 (Metacognitive Training for Negative Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06127004 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Metacognitive Training for Negative Symptoms (MCT Minus)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSormland County Council, SwedenRan2024 to 2032Enrolled90ConditionsNegative Symptoms in SchizophreniaArmsMetacognitive Training for Negative Symptoms (MCT), Supportive Counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis: a systematic review and grade recommendations.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy of metacognitive therapies in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
  6. Efficacy of metacognitive therapies in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin PosDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Meibergdreef 5, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. K.Pos@amc.uva.nl.
Carin J MeijerEarly Psychosis Department, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oukje VerkerkEarly Psychosis Department, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Onno AckemaEarly Psychosis Department, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lydia KrabbendamDepartment of Educational Neuroscience, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanEarly Psychosis Department, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive biases, negative affect and negative self-esteem are associated with paranoia in people with psychotic disorders. Metacognitive group training (MCT) aims to target these biases although research has shown mixed results. Our objective was to establish the effect of MCT on paranoid ideation in patients with recent onset psychosis in a powerful experience sampling design. 50 patients between the age of 18 and 35 were included in a single-blind, parallel group RCT comparing MCT with occupational therapy (OT) as an active control condition. We assessed via questionnaires and experience sampling treatment effects on paranoid ideation, delusional conviction, the cognitive bias jumping to conclusion (JTC), and cognitive insight, as well as treatment effects on associations between negative affect, negative self-esteem and paranoid ideation. Patients in the MCT group did not show a decrease in paranoid ideation, delusional conviction, JTC-bias or an increase in cognitive insight compared with OT. However, negative affect showed a weaker association with paranoid ideation post-treatment in the MCT condition. In the OT condition, this association was stronger post-treatment. We tentatively suggest that patients with an early psychosis seemed to benefit from MCT in emotional learning compared with the OT condition. Despite the fact that the group training is well-received by patients, subsequent individual MCT (MCT+) may be indicated for stronger favorable effects on paranoid ideation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCognition DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMetacognitionOccupational TherapyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRetrospective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultEarly psychosisExperience samplingMetacognitive trainingRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28828697
PMCPMC5778181
OpenAlexW2750322365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.