ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent germinal tumor carcinoma.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- [Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Late relapsing testicular cancer detected with 18F-FDG PET preceded by long-term alpha-fetoprotein elevation.Urology case reports · 2023Article
- Molecular Imaging for Evaluation of Viable Testicular Cancer Nodal Metastases.Current urology reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this bicentric retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value, the incremental prognostic value and the impact on therapeutic management of MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom the databases of two centers including 31,500
resultsRecurrent GCT was confirmed in 47 of 52 patients with pathological
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.