ArticleParasitology research2017
Improving the efficacy of a prophylactic vaccine formulation against lymphatic filariasis.
Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A next-generation human lymphatic filariasis vaccine candidate, rBmHAXT, for clinical development.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Dynamics of Human Filarial Infections: Immunological Responses, Host Manifestations, and Pathogen Biology.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Identification and prioritisation of potential vaccine candidates using subtractive proteomics and designing of a multi-epitope vaccine against Wuchereria bancrofti.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Enhanced protective immunity against Baylisascaris schroederi infection in mice through a multi-antigen cocktail vaccine approach.Parasitology research · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of a multi-epitope in silico vaccine model for lymphatic filariasis by targetingBulletin of the National Research Centre · 2023Article
- Highlighting the Relevance of CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Article
- Advances in Vaccine Development for Human Lymphatic Filariasis.Trends in parasitology · 2020Review
- Prospects of developing a prophylactic vaccine against human lymphatic filariasis - evaluation of protection in non-human primates.International journal for parasitology · 2018Article
- Evaluating the Vaccine Potential of a Tetravalent Fusion Protein (Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Metazoan Parasite Vaccines: Present Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mass drug administration (MDA) is the current strategy for interrupting the transmission of lymphatic filariasis (LF) infection and control of the disease in endemic areas. However, subject non-compliance has resulted in the presence of several "transmission hotspots" in the endemic regions threatening the reemergence of LF. This situation is further complicated by the fact that the drugs used in MDA are not effective against adult LF worms, a major concern for the control strategy. Thus, there is clearly a need for an effective and sustainable approach to control LF. Prophylactic vaccine combined with targeted treatment of infected patients and vector control is suggested as a more sustainable strategy to eliminate LF infection from endemic regions. A multivalent vaccine (rBmHAT) developed in our laboratory conferred about 90% protection in rodents. However, when we tested the rBmHAT vaccine along with alum in rhesus macaques, only about 40% protection was achieved and the immune response obtained was Th2 biased. In an attempt to improve the vaccine, in this study, we tested two vaccine antigens (rBmHAT and rBmHAX) along with two adjuvant formulations [alum + GLA (AL019) and mannosylated chitosan (MCA)] in a mouse model. Our results show that rBmHAT is a better vaccine antigen than rBmHAX. Combination of rBmHAT with AL019 or MCA adjuvants gave 94 and 88% protection, respectively, against challenge infections. Immunized animals developed antigen-specific memory T cells that secreted significant levels of IL-4, IFN-γ, and IL-17 suggesting the generation of a balanced Th1/Th2 responses following immunization. A major advantage of MCA adjuvant is that the vaccine booster doses can be administered orally. These studies thus showed that rBmHAT is a better vaccine antigen and can be given in combination with AL019 or MCA adjuvant to obtain excellent results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.