ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2018
Does formalin fixation influence MSCT/CBCT accuracy?
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Investigation of the palatal soft tissue volume: a 3D virtual analysis for digital workflows and presurgical planning.BMC oral health · 2022Observational
- 3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT.European radiology experimental · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdvanced imaging modalities, such as multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), greatly facilitate diagnostic medicine. In radiological research, it is important to know how accurately a scanned object is visualized, and whether the methodology leads to image distortion. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether formalin fixation impacted the accuracy of virtual 3D bone models generated via CBCT and MSCT using a software-based evaluation method that excluded human measurement errors.
methodsA head specimen, with and without formalin preservation, was subjected to MSCT and CBCT scans using the manufacturers' predefined scanning protocols. Digital models of the lower jaw were constructed and superimposed with a master model generated based on optical scanning with an industrial non-contact scanner. Means and standard deviations were calculated to assess accuracy, and a t test was used for comparisons between the fixed and unfixed specimens.
resultsThe extent of discrepancy between the fixed and unfixed specimens was analyzed using a total of 200 points (n = 200) in each specimen state. The mean deviation between states was 0.01 mm for MSCT (at both 80 and 140 kV). Mean values from CBCT at 0.4 voxel did not differ between states.
conclusionsOur results suggest that formalin fixation of an anatomical specimen does not substantially affect the accuracy of a three-dimensional image generated with CBCT and MSCT. Thus, fixed specimen can be used in future investigations of 3D models without concerns regarding the accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.