Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828486›Full record

Observational studyJAMA pediatrics2017

Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children.

Maala Bhatt, David W Johnson, Jason Chan, Monica Taljaard, Nick Barrowman, Ken J Farion, Samina Ali, Suzanne Beno, Andrew Dixon, C Michelle McTimoney and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Incidence of Post-Sedation Emesis in Cynomolgus (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Maala BhattDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David W JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jason ChanChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nick BarrowmanChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ken J FarionDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Samina AliDepartment of Pediatrics, Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne BenoDepartment of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew DixonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
C Michelle McTimoneyDepartment of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alexander Sasha DubrovskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nadia SourialChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mark G RobackDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Sedation Safety Study Group of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC)
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAStollery Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR FRN-79859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Procedural sedation for children undergoing painful procedures is standard practice in emergency departments worldwide. Previous studies of emergency department sedation are limited by their single-center design and are underpowered to identify risk factors for serious adverse events (SAEs), thereby limiting their influence on sedation practice and patient outcomes. Objective: To examine the incidence and risk factors associated with sedation-related SAEs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted in 6 pediatric emergency departments in Canada between July 10, 2010, and February 28, 2015. Children 18 years or younger who received sedation for a painful emergency department procedure were enrolled in the study. Of the 9657 patients eligible for inclusion, 6760 (70.0%) were enrolled and 6295 (65.1%) were included in the final analysis. Exposures: The primary risk factor was receipt of sedation medication. The secondary risk factors were demographic characteristics, preprocedural medications and fasting status, current or underlying health risks, and procedure type. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four outcomes were examined: SAEs, significant interventions performed in response to an adverse event, oxygen desaturation, and vomiting. Results: Of the 6295 children included in this study, 4190 (66.6%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 8.0 (4.6) years. Adverse events occurred in 736 patients (11.7%; 95% CI, 6.4%-16.9%). Oxygen desaturation (353 patients [5.6%]) and vomiting (328 [5.2%]) were the most common of these adverse events. There were 69 SAEs (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.5%-1.7%), and 86 patients (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.7%-2.1%) had a significant intervention. Use of ketamine hydrochloride alone resulted in the lowest incidence of SAEs (17 [0.4%]) and significant interventions (37 [0.9%]). The incidence of adverse sedation outcomes varied significantly with the type of sedation medication. Compared with ketamine alone, propofol alone (3.7%; odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% CI, 2.3-13.1) and the combinations of ketamine and fentanyl citrate (3.2%; OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.5-15.2) and ketamine and propofol (2.1%; OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.3-8.7) had the highest incidence of SAEs. The combinations of ketamine and fentanyl (4.1%; OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.8-8.1) and ketamine and propofol (2.5%; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.8) had the highest incidence of significant interventions. Conclusions and Relevance: The incidence of adverse sedation outcomes varied significantly with type of sedation medication. Use of ketamine only was associated with the best outcomes, resulting in significantly fewer SAEs and interventions than ketamine combined with propofol or fentanyl.

Indexed as

AdolescentCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDeep SedationEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIncidenceInfantMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID28828486
PMCPMC5710624
OpenAlexW2748371715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.