Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828377›Full record

ArticlemHealth2017

Evaluating clinicians' user experience and acceptability of

Tripti Pande, Kavitha Saravu, Zelalem Temesgen, Al Seyoum, Shipra Rai, Raghavendra Rao, Deekshith Mahadev, Madhukar Pai, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tripti PandeDépartement de médecine préventive et sociale, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Kavitha SaravuDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
Zelalem TemesgenMayo Clinic Center for Tuberculosis, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MI, USA.
Al SeyoumMayo Clinic Center for Tuberculosis, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MI, USA.
Shipra RaiDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
Raghavendra RaoDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
Deekshith MahadevDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
Madhukar PaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonDépartement de médecine préventive et sociale, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INUniversité Laval · CAWinnMed · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious killer, and India accounts for 2.8 of the 10.4 million TB cases that occur each year, making it the highest TB burden country worldwide. Poor quality of TB care is a major driver of the epidemic in India. India's large private, unregulated sector manages over 50% of the TB patients, with studies showing suboptimal diagnosis and treatment in the private sector. Better education of doctors using mobile applications (apps) is a possible solution. While India has seen an explosion of mobile phone services, and while the use of mobile health interventions has been gaining interest, little is known about mHealth around tuberculosis in India.

methodsOur study aimed to understand the user experience and acceptability of a smartphone application,

resultsA response rate of 99% was achieved; 100 participants responded to the second questionnaire and 100% of the participants responded to the first questionnaire. User experience was very high [mean SUS score =94.4 (92.07-96.76)]. Perceived usefulness (PU) was significantly correlated to intention to use (IU) (r=0.707, P<0.0001), and perceived ease of use (PEU) was significantly correlated to PU (r=0.466, P<0.0001). Path analysis confirmed the direct relationship between PU and IU (0.936, P<0.0001), and the indirect relationship between PEU and IU (0.5102, P<0.0001). Logistic regression analysis helped target items strongly influencing IU, such as "The use of the

conclusionThe first part of the study indicated high user experience of the

Indexed as

mHealthmobile applicationTechnology Assessment Model (TAM)tuberculosisuser experience

Identifiers

PMID28828377
PMCPMC5547173
OpenAlexW2741557613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.