ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017
Prone positioning acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward optimal mechanical ventilation of the injured lung: the role of expiratory duration.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Urgent surgical patient classification: Development and validation of a novel instrument using the Delphi approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Are there differences between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 inpatient pressure injuries? Experiences in Internal Medicine Units.PloS one · 2022Article
- Therapeutic Modulation of the Host Defense by Hemoadsorption with CytoSorbInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Role of proning and positive end-expiratory pressure in COVID-19.World journal of critical care medicine · 2021Review
- A Quick Review on the Multisystem Effects of Prone Position in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Including COVID-19.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2021Review
- Clinical Experience, Pathophysiology, and Considerations in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Hypercoagulopathy of COVID-19: A Review Study.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2021Review
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Literature Review from a Nursing Perspective.BioMedicine · 2021Review
- Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Narrative Review on Prone Position.Pulmonary therapy · 2020Review
- A narrative review of non-pharmacological management of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory failure: a call for an evidence based approach.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- The Fundamentals of Respiratory Physiology to Manage the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Pressure Injury Prevention in COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- A multidisciplinary approach to prevent and treat pressure sores in proned COVID-19 patients at a quaternary university hospital.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prone position has been used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients for more than 40 years in ICU. After having demonstrated its capability to significantly improve oxygenation in a large number of patients, sometimes dramatically, this procedure has been found to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury, the primary concern for the intensivists managing ARDS patients. Over the time, several trials have been done, which regularly improved and refined from each other. At the end, significant improvement in survival has been demonstrated in the most severe ARDS patients, at a threshold of 100-150 mmHg PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.