Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828358›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017

Biomarkers for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: how to make the diagnosis more precise.

M Isabel García-Laorden, José A Lorente, Carlos Flores, Arthur S Slutsky, Jesús Villar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07328997 (Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07328997 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), AI (Artificial Intelligence)ArmsCT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Lung Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in ARDS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Isabel García-LaordenCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José A LorenteCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos FloresCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Arthur S SlutskyKeenan Research Center for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jesús VillarCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute inflammatory process of the lung caused by a direct or indirect insult to the alveolar-capillary membrane. Currently, ARDS is diagnosed based on a combination of clinical and physiological variables. The lack of a specific biomarker for ARDS is arguably one of the most important obstacles to progress in developing novel treatments for ARDS. In this article, we will review the current understanding of some appealing biomarkers that have been measured in human blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or exhaled gas that could be used for identifying patients with ARDS, for enrolling ARDS patients into clinical trials, or for better monitoring of patient's management. After a literature search, we identified several biomarkers that are associated with the highest sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis or outcome prediction of ARDS: receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), surfactant protein D (SP-D), inteleukin-8, Fas and Fas ligand, procollagen peptide (PCP) I and III, octane, acetaldehyde, and 3-methylheptane. In general, these are cell-specific for epithelial or endothelial injury or involved in the inflammatory or infectious response. No biomarker or biomarkers have yet been confirmed for the diagnosis of ARDS or prediction of its prognosis. However, it is anticipated that in the near future, using biomarkers for defining ARDS, or for determining those patients who are more likely to benefit from a given therapy will have a major effect on clinical practice.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)biomarkersdiffuse alveolar damage (DAD)endothelial lung injuryepithelial lung injury

Identifiers

PMID28828358
PMCPMC5537109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.