Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828294›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2017

A review of the mechanism of action and clinical applications of sorafenib in advanced osteosarcoma.

James Coventon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sorafenib in patients with progressed and refractory bone tumors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James CoventonJames Cook University, College of Medicine and Dentistry, 1 James Cook Drive, Douglas, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
James Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarise the contemporary literature regarding sorafenib and its effectiveness as a novel treatment in advanced osteosarcoma.

backgroundModern treatment has seen the cure rate of osteosarcoma increase to 65%. However, in patients who do not achieve remission, prognosis is poor, as there are no effective, consensual second line therapies. Sorafenib has emerged as a potentially viable drug to be used in this context.

methodA literature review was conducted evaluating articles pertaining to osteosarcoma and sorafenib. DISCUSSION: Clinical studies were prioritised, but preclinical data was also evaluated to elaborate on mechanisms and potential targets for the future. Limitations of the review and data were explored.

conclusionIn isolation, sorafenib was shown to only provide brief clinical benefit due to various described mechanisms. However, when combined with other drugs that addressed its weaknesses or other aspects of the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma, it proved to be effective in reducing disease progression in a variety of advanced cases. Further investigation into the use of sorafenib in combination therapy is needed. Specifically, the combination of sorafenib with denosumab has displayed potential to be an effective future treatment for osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Advanced osteosarcomaBevacizumabDenosumabERKEverolimusItalian Sarcoma GroupMAPKMTORCNexavarNovel therapyPrimary bone cancerRANKLSecond lineSorafenibTemsirolimusTyrosine kinase

Identifiers

PMID28828294
PMCPMC5552021
OpenAlexW2743762419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.