Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828276›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Pyrrolizidine alkaloid variation in

Dandan Cheng, Viet-Thang Nguyen, Noel Ndihokubwayo, Jiwen Ge, Patrick P J Mulder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comment on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids and Terpenes fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Identification of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids inJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2021
    Article
  8. Occurrence of Nine Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Dandan ChengState Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China.
Viet-Thang NguyenSchool of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China.
Noel NdihokubwayoSchool of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China.
Jiwen GeHubei Key Laboratory of Wetland Evolution & Ecological Restoration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China.
Patrick P J MulderRIKILT, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
China University of Geosciences · CNÉcole Normale Supérieure · BIWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasion is regarded as one of the greatest environmental problems facilitated by globalization. Some hypotheses about the invasive mechanisms of alien invasive plants consider the plant-herbivore interaction and the role of plant defense in this interaction. For example, the "Shift Defense Hypothesis" (SDH) argues that introduced plants evolve higher levels of qualitative defense chemicals and decreased levels of quantitative defense, as they are released of the selective pressures from specialist herbivores but still face attack from generalists. Common groundsel (

Indexed as

Biological invasionDiversityLiquid chromatography-tanderm mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)Qualitative defenseSecondary metaboliteShift Defense Hypothesis (SDH)

Identifiers

PMID28828276
PMCPMC5560238
OpenAlexW2745350249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.