Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828209›Full record

Observational studyBrain and behavior2017

Prevalence for delirium in stroke patients: A prospective controlled study.

Peter Nydahl, Gabriele Bartoszek, Andreas Binder, Laura Paschen, Nils G Margraf, Karsten Witt, Andre Ewers

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Pitfalls in the diagnosis of delirium].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Study protocol to improve the quality of delirium management in intensive care].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Quality improvement and delirium.European geriatric medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter NydahlNursing research Campus Kiel University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein Kiel Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5178-0364
Gabriele BartoszekFaculty of Health School of Nursing Science Witten/Herdecke University Witten Germany.
Andreas BinderDepartment of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Christian-Albrechts University Kiel Kiel Germany.
Laura PaschenDepartment of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Christian-Albrechts University Kiel Kiel Germany.
Nils G MargrafDepartment of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Christian-Albrechts University Kiel Kiel Germany.
Karsten WittDepartment of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Christian-Albrechts University Kiel Kiel Germany.
Andre EwersInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Austria.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study investigates the prevalence of delirium in acute stroke patients on a primary stroke unit (SU) analyzing associated risk factors and clinical outcomes.

methodProspective, 4-month observational study from 2015 to 2016 on patients aged ≥18 years with stroke at a German university hospital's SU. The presence of delirium as first outcome was rated at three times daily using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Secondary outcome measures were duration of delirium, rehabilitation in SU, length of stay in SU and hospital, complications, and mortality. Significant risk factors were used to conduct a confounder-matched case-control analysis.

results309 patients were included. The overall prevalence of delirium was 10.7% (33 patients) mostly on the first and second hospital day. Duration of delirium on SU was in median 1.0 day (Interquartile range: 0.3-2 days). In 39.4% of patients delirium was present in a short time interval (≤8 hr) and in 24% of patients delirium was diagnosed during nightshifts exclusively. Significant risk factors for delirium were dementia, age ≥72 years, severe neurological disability on admission, and increased C-reactive protein on admission. The case-control analysis showed that delirious patients had more complications and a trend toward a worse rehabilitation.

conclusionsThese results underline the importance of delirium screening in stroke patients specifically during the night. Since even short delirious episodes are associated with more complications and increased disability, future studies are needed to find delirium prevention strategies.

Indexed as

DeliriumStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLength of StayMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsConfusion Assessment Methoddeliriumrehabilitationstroke unit

Identifiers

PMID28828209
PMCPMC5561309
OpenAlexW2671106286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.