Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28828090›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2017

Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals.

Gilmar Weber Senna, Bernardo Minelli Rodrigues, Daniel Sandy, Estevão Scudese, Antonino Bianco, Estélio Henrique Martin Dantas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gilmar Weber SennaNursing and Biosciences Post-Graduation Program (PPgEnfBio) - Doctorate of Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)RJ - Brazil.
Bernardo Minelli RodriguesLaboratory of Biosciences and Human Movement (LABIMH) - Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil.
Daniel SandyLaboratory of Biosciences and Human Movement (LABIMH) - Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil.
Estevão ScudeseLaboratory of Biosciences and Human Movement (LABIMH) - Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil.
Antonino BiancoSport and Exercise Science Research Unit - Università degli Studi di Palermo - Palermo - Italy.
Estélio Henrique Martin DantasNursing and Biosciences Post-Graduation Program (PPgEnfBio) - Doctorate of Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)RJ - Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176.75 ± 3.33 cm, 24.53 ± 1.47 kg/m2) performed a test and retest of 1-RM on non-consecutive days. Forty-eight hours after load testing, the participants were randomly assigned to six sessions consisting of four sets of the triceps pull-down, combining different intensities with distinct rest periods between sets. The shorter 1 minute rest promoted a significant reduction in the total repetition number compared to 3 minute rest for both workloads. There was a difference between 3 and 5 minute conditions for the 50% of 1-RM that did not occur for the 80% of 1-RM condition. Both intensities presented significant interaction values for the rest conditions vs. each set (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). Additionally, significant values were found for the main effect of the performance of subsequent sets (50% p = 0.003; 80% p = 0.001) and rest conditions (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for heavier loads (80%) to fatigue, longer rest of 3 to 5 minutes seems to allow for better recovery between sets and thus, promotes a greater volume. However, when training with lighter loads (50%), the magnitude of the rest seems to directly affect the performance of subsequent sets, and also presents a correlation with total volume achieved for the upper body single-joint exercise scheme.

Indexed as

health promotionmuscular strengthphysical fitnessweight lifting

Identifiers

PMID28828090
PMCPMC5548167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.