Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827895›Full record

ArticleCognitive development2017

The Drosophila

H Moriah Sokolowski, Oscar E Vasquez, Eva Unternaehrer, Dustin J Sokolowski, Stephanie D Biergans, Leslie Atkinson, Andrea Gonzalez, Patricia P Silveira, Robert Levitan, Kieran J O'Donnell and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiple methods for assessing learning and memory inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. TheJournal of neurogenetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Biological embedding of experience: A primer on epigenetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  6. Self-regulation and theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Epigenetic mechanisms modulate differences inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

H Moriah SokolowskiDepartment of Psychology, Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, Westminster Hall, Room 325, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7.
Oscar E VasquezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 25 Wilcocks St. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3B2.
Eva UnternaehrerLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, 6875, Boulevard LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4H 1R3.
Dustin J SokolowskiDepartment of Biology, University of Western, Ontario, Toronto, Canada, N6A 3K7.
Stephanie D BiergansDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 25 Wilcocks St. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3B2.
Leslie AtkinsonDepartment of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B2K3.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster Innovation Park, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8S 4K1.
Patricia P SilveiraLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, 6875, Boulevard LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4H 1R3.
Robert LevitanWomen's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8G 5E4.
Kieran J O'DonnellLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, 6875, Boulevard LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4H 1R3.
Meir SteinerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster Innovation Park, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8S 4K1.
James KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto and Centre for Addiction an Mental Health, 33 Russell St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3M1.
Michael J MeaneyLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, 6875, Boulevard LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4H 1R3.
Alison S FlemingDepartment of Psychology, 100 St. George Street, Sidney Smith Hall Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3.
Marla B SokolowskiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 25 Wilcocks St. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3B2.
University of Toronto · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcMaster University · CAWestern University · CACanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMcGill University · CASmiths Detection (Canada) · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

Genes underlying food-related behaviors in Drosphila.R01DK070141 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI SOKOLOWSKI, MARLA B · 2004 to 2007
$954k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is variation in the extent to which childhood adverse experience affects adult individual differences in maternal behavior. Genetic variation in the animal

Indexed as

cGMP-dependent protein kinasedevelopmentearly adversityforaginggene-environment interactiongenetic variantsmaternal sensitivitymicroRNApolymorphismPRKG1

Identifiers

PMID28827895
PMCPMC5562168
OpenAlexW2565037296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.