Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Risk Model for Prostate Cancer Using Environmental and Genetic Factors in the Spanish Multi-Case-Control (MCC) Study.

Inés Gómez-Acebo, Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Pablo Fernandez-Navarro, Camilo Palazuelos, Víctor Moreno, Nuria Aragonés, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Jose J Jiménez-Monleón, Jose Luis Ruiz-Cerdá, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular mechanisms involving prostate cancer racial disparity.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Inés Gómez-AceboCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. ines.gomez@unican.es.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-8314
Trinidad Dierssen-SotosCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Fernandez-NavarroCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Camilo PalazuelosUniversity of Cantabria - IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Víctor MorenoCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Nuria AragonésCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Gemma Castaño-VinyalsCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Jose J Jiménez-MonleónCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Jose Luis Ruiz-CerdáUrology Department, La Fe University Hospital, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Beatriz Pérez-GómezCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-8214
José Manuel Ruiz-DominguezUrology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet, S/N, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jessica Alonso MoleroUniversity of Cantabria - IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Marina PollánCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Manolis KogevinasCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Javier LlorcaCIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. Its etiology remains largely unknown compared to other common cancers. We have developed a risk stratification model combining environmental factors with family history and genetic susceptibility. 818 PCa cases and 1,006 healthy controls were compared. Subjects were interviewed on major lifestyle factors and family history. Fifty-six PCa susceptibility SNPs were genotyped. Risk models based on logistic regression were developed to combine environmental factors, family history and a genetic risk score. In the whole model, compared with subjects with low risk (reference category, decile 1), those carrying an intermediate risk (decile 5) had a 265% increase in PCa risk (OR = 3.65, 95% CI 2.26 to 5.91). The genetic risk score had an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.66 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.68). When adding the environmental score and family history to the genetic risk score, the AUROC increased by 0.05, reaching 0.71 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.74). Genetic susceptibility has a stronger risk value of the prediction that modifiable risk factors. While the added value of each SNP is small, the combination of 56 SNPs adds to the predictive ability of the risk model.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, StatisticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsROC CurveSpainYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28827750
PMCPMC5566549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.