Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827745›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Establishing PNB-qPCR for quantifying minimal ctDNA concentrations during tumour resection.

T Ehlert, S Tug, A Brahmer, V Neef, F Heid, C Werner, B Jansen-Winkeln, W Kneist, H Lang, I Gockel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

T EhlertDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Faculty of Social Science, Media and Sport, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
S TugDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Faculty of Social Science, Media and Sport, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
A BrahmerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Faculty of Social Science, Media and Sport, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
V NeefDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
F HeidDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
C WernerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
B Jansen-WinkelnDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
W KneistDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
H LangDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
I GockelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
P SimonDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Faculty of Social Science, Media and Sport, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. simonpe@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of blood plasma or serum as a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsies is a much-pursued goal in cancer research. Various methods and approaches have been presented to determine a patient's tumour status, chances of survival, and response to therapy from serum or plasma samples. We established PNB-qPCR (Pooled, Nested, WT-Blocking qPCR), a highly specific nested qPCR with various modifications to detect and quantify minute amounts of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from very limited blood plasma samples. PNB-qPCR is a nested qPCR technique combining ARMS primers, blocking primers, LNA probes, and pooling of multiple first round products for sensitive quantification of the seven most frequent point mutations in KRAS exon 2. Using this approach, we were able to characterize ctDNA and total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) kinetics by selective amplification of KRAS mutated DNA fragments in the blood plasma over the course of tumour resection and the surrounding days. Whereas total cfDNA concentrations increased over the surgical and regenerative process, ctDNA levels showed a different scheme, rising only directly after tumour resection and about three days after the surgery. For the first time, we present insights into the impact of surgery on the release of ctDNA and total cfDNA.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA, NeoplasmDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansMutationNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA, NeoplasmKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID28827745
PMCPMC5566323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.