Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Metabolic Reconstruction and Modeling Microbial Electrosynthesis.

Christopher W Marshall, Daniel E Ross, Kim M Handley, Pamela B Weisenhorn, Janaka N Edirisinghe, Christopher S Henry, Jack A Gilbert, Harold D May, R Sean Norman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Steering Bioelectrochemical COBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. HBiotechnology and bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from COEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. FeRSC advances · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Enrichment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher W MarshallBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA. chris.w.marshall@gmail.com.
Daniel E RossDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Kim M HandleyComputing, Environment, and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0531-3009
Pamela B WeisenhornBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA.
Janaka N EdirisingheComputing, Environment, and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA.
Christopher S HenryComputing, Environment, and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA.
Jack A GilbertBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA.
Harold D MayDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
R Sean NormanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA. rsnorman@sc.edu.
Argonne National Laboratory · USUniversity of South Carolina · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis is a renewable energy and chemical production platform that relies on microbial cells to capture electrons from a cathode and fix carbon. Yet despite the promise of this technology, the metabolic capacity of the microbes that inhabit the electrode surface and catalyze electron transfer in these systems remains largely unknown. We assembled thirteen draft genomes from a microbial electrosynthesis system producing primarily acetate from carbon dioxide, and their transcriptional activity was mapped to genomes from cells on the electrode surface and in the supernatant. This allowed us to create a metabolic model of the predominant community members belonging to Acetobacterium, Sulfurospirillum, and Desulfovibrio. According to the model, the Acetobacterium was the primary carbon fixer, and a keystone member of the community. Transcripts of soluble hydrogenases and ferredoxins from Acetobacterium and hydrogenases, formate dehydrogenase, and cytochromes of Desulfovibrio were found in high abundance near the electrode surface. Cytochrome c oxidases of facultative members of the community were highly expressed in the supernatant despite completely sealed reactors and constant flushing with anaerobic gases. These molecular discoveries and metabolic modeling now serve as a foundation for future examination and development of electrosynthetic microbial communities.

Indexed as

ElectricityAcetatesAcetobacteriumBioelectric Energy SourcesCampylobacteraceaeCarbon DioxideDesulfovibrioElectrodesElectron TransportGene Expression ProfilingGenome, BacterialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysAcetatesCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID28827682
PMCPMC5566340
OpenAlexW2951863765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.