Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827357›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Nathan C Higgins, Susan A McLaughlin, Teemu Rinne, G Christopher Stecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Representation of Auditory Motion Directions and Sound Source Locations in the Human Planum Temporale.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Active Sound Localization Sharpens Spatial Tuning in Human Primary Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan C HigginsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232; nathan.higgins@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-6448
Susan A McLaughlinInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Teemu RinneTurku Brain and Mind Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.
G Christopher SteckerDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232.

Funding

Temporal weighting of auditory spatial cuesR01DC011548 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STECKER, GEORGE CHRISTOPHER · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few auditory functions are as important or as universal as the capacity for auditory spatial awareness (e.g., sound localization). That ability relies on sensitivity to acoustical cues-particularly interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD)-that correlate with sound-source locations. Under nonspatial listening conditions, cortical sensitivity to ITD and ILD takes the form of broad contralaterally dominated response functions. It is unknown, however, whether that sensitivity reflects representations of the specific physical cues or a higher-order representation of auditory space (i.e., integrated cue processing), nor is it known whether responses to spatial cues are modulated by active spatial listening. To investigate, sensitivity to parametrically varied ITD or ILD cues was measured using fMRI during spatial and nonspatial listening tasks. Task type varied across blocks where targets were presented in one of three dimensions: auditory location, pitch, or visual brightness. Task effects were localized primarily to lateral posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) and modulated binaural-cue response functions differently in the two hemispheres. Active spatial listening (location tasks) enhanced both contralateral and ipsilateral responses in the right hemisphere but maintained or enhanced contralateral dominance in the left hemisphere. Two observations suggest integrated processing of ITD and ILD. First, overlapping regions in medial pSTG exhibited significant sensitivity to both cues. Second, successful classification of multivoxel patterns was observed for both cue types and-critically-for cross-cue classification. Together, these results suggest a higher-order representation of auditory space in the human auditory cortex that at least partly integrates the specific underlying cues.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionCuesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearingHumansMaleSoundSound LocalizationYoung Adultauditory spacebinaural cuesfMRIhuman auditory cortexsound localization

Identifiers

PMID28827357
PMCPMC5594681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.