Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28827261›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.

Marc Kriege, Christian Alflen, Irene Tzanova, Irene Schmidtmann, Tim Piepho, Ruediger R Noppens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06676462 (Pilot Study Comparing the HEINE visionPRO HyMac 3 and the GlideScope Hyperangulated S3 Laryngoscope Blade on Time to Intubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06676462 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study Comparing the HEINE visionPRO HyMac 3 and the GlideScope Hyperangulated S3 Laryngoscope Blade on Time to Intubation

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsIntubation, Difficult or Failed, Intubation Complication, Video LaryngoscopyArmsVideo laryngoscopy with visionPRO, Video laryngoscopy with Glidescope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Airway Management: The Current Role of Videolaryngoscopy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc KriegeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Christian AlflenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Irene TzanovaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Christophorus Hospital, Coesfeld, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Tim PiephoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Ruediger R NoppensDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEChristophorus Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe direct laryngoscopy technique using a Macintosh blade is the first choice globally for most anaesthetists. In case of an unanticipated difficult airway, the complication rate increases with the number of intubation attempts. Recently, McGrath MAC (McGrath) video laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for securing an airway by tracheal intubation because it allows the visualisation of the glottis without a direct line of sight. Several studies and case reports have highlighted the benefit of the video laryngoscope in the visualisation of the glottis and found it to be superior in difficult intubation situations. The aim of this study was to compare the first-pass intubation success rate using the (McGrath) video laryngoscope compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy in surgical patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The EMMA trial is a multicentre, open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring tracheal intubation are randomly allocated to either the McGrath video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. The expected rate of successful first-pass intubation is 95% in the McGrath group and 90% in the Macintosh group. Each group must include a total of 1000 patients to achieve 96% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Successful intubation with the first attempt is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints are the time to intubation, attempts for successful intubation, the necessity of alternatives, visualisation of the glottis using the Cormack & Lehane score and percentage of glottic opening score and definite complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state and Westphalia-Lippe. The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02611986; pre-results.

Indexed as

GlottisAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleGermanyHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopesLaryngoscopyMaleProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisResearch DesignVideo-Assisted Surgeryadult anaesthesiaairway managementdifficult airwaydintubationmacintosh laryngoscopevideo laryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID28827261
PMCPMC5724220
OpenAlexW2748431521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.