Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28826499›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Ingression-type cell migration drives vegetal endoderm internalisation in the

Jason Wh Wen, Rudolf Winklbauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Biological Significance of Trogocytosis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Defined Microenvironments Trigger In Vitro Gastrulation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dynamics ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell-cell contact landscapes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason Wh WenDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7402-5073
Rudolf WinklbauerDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-0897
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-53075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During amphibian gastrulation, presumptive endoderm is internalised as part of vegetal rotation, a large-scale movement that encompasses the whole vegetal half of the embryo. It has been considered a gastrulation process unique to amphibians, but we show that at the cell level, endoderm internalisation exhibits characteristics reminiscent of bottle cell formation and ingression, known mechanisms of germ layer internalisation. During ingression proper, cells leave a single-layered epithelium. In vegetal rotation, the process occurs in a multilayered cell mass; we refer to it as ingression-type cell migration. Endoderm cells move by amoeboid shape changes, but in contrast to other instances of amoeboid migration, trailing edge retraction involves ephrinB1-dependent macropinocytosis and

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementEmbryo, NonmammalianEndodermGastrulaXenopus laeviscadherincell biologycell migrationdevelopmental biologyephrinfibronectingastrulationstem cellsxenopus

Identifiers

PMID28826499
PMCPMC5589415
OpenAlexW2743054544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.