Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28826483›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Distinct hippocampal-cortical memory representations for experiences associated with movement versus immobility.

Jai Y Yu, Kenneth Kay, Daniel F Liu, Irene Grossrubatscher, Adrianna Loback, Marielena Sosa, Jason E Chung, Mattias P Karlsson, Margaret C Larkin, Loren M Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The hippocampus as a small-world cognitive map.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How our understanding of memory replay evolves.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Imagination as a fundamental function of the hippocampus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jai Y YuDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-2531
Kenneth KayDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Daniel F LiuUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Irene GrossrubatscherUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Adrianna LobackPrinceton University, Princeton, United States.
Marielena SosaDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Jason E ChungDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Mattias P KarlssonDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Margaret C LarkinDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Loren M FrankDepartment of Physiology, UCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-5677

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
Real-time analysis of memories and decisionsR01MH105174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDEN, URI TZVI, FRANK, LOREN M · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While ongoing experience proceeds continuously, memories of past experience are often recalled as episodes with defined beginnings and ends. The neural mechanisms that lead to the formation of discrete episodes from the stream of neural activity patterns representing ongoing experience are unknown. To investigate these mechanisms, we recorded neural activity in the rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, structures critical for memory processes. We show that during spatial navigation, hippocampal CA1 place cells maintain a continuous spatial representation across different states of motion (movement and immobility). In contrast, during sharp-wave ripples (SWRs), when representations of experience are transiently reactivated from memory, movement- and immobility-associated activity patterns are most often reactivated separately. Concurrently, distinct hippocampal reactivations of movement- or immobility-associated representations are accompanied by distinct modulation patterns in prefrontal cortex. These findings demonstrate a continuous representation of ongoing experience can be separated into independently reactivated memory representations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain WavesCA1 Region, HippocampalInterneuronsMaleMental RecallMovementPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Long-EvansRestSpatial MemoryTemporal Lobehippocampusmemoryneuroscienceprefrontal cortexratsharp wave-ripple

Identifiers

PMID28826483
PMCPMC5576488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.