Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28826089›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2018

Considering sex differences clarifies the effects of depression on facial emotion processing during fMRI.

L M Jenkins, A D Kendall, M T Kassel, V G Patrón, J R Gowins, C Dion, S A Shankman, S L Weisenbach, P Maki, S A Langenecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L M JenkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
A D KendallDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, USA.
M T KasselDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
V G PatrónDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
J R GowinsDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
C DionDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
S A ShankmanDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Department of Psychology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
S L WeisenbachDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Utah, USA.
P MakiDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
S A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Departments of Psychiatry, The University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: slangen@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Neurobiological Intermediate Phenotypes of Major Depressive DisorderR01MH091811 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANGENECKER, SCOTT A · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSex differences in emotion processing may play a role in women's increased risk for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, studies of sex differences in brain mechanisms involved in emotion processing in MDD (or interactions of sex and diagnosis) are sparse.

methodsWe conducted an event-related fMRI study examining the interactive and distinct effects of sex and MDD on neural activity during a facial emotion perception task. To minimize effects of current affective state and cumulative disease burden, we studied participants with remitted MDD (rMDD) who were early in the course of the illness. In total, 88 individuals aged 18-23 participated, including 48 with rMDD (32 female) and 40 healthy controls (HC; 25 female).

resultsfMRI revealed an interaction between sex and diagnosis for sad and neutral facial expressions in the superior frontal gyrus and left middle temporal gyrus. Results also revealed an interaction of sex with diagnosis in the amygdala. LIMITATIONS: Data was from two sites, which might increase variability, but it also increases power to examine sex by diagnosis interactions.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the importance of taking sex differences into account when examining potential trait (or scar) mechanisms that could be useful in identifying individuals at-risk for MDD as well as for evaluating potential therapeutic innovations.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAmygdalaDepressionEmotionsFaceFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexSex CharacteristicsYoung AdultFacial emotion perceptionFMRIMajor depressionRemittedSex differencesSuperior frontal gyrus

Identifiers

PMID28826089
PMCPMC5626645
OpenAlexW2747795939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.