Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825900›Full record

ArticleInternational perspectives on sexual and reproductive health2016

Male Involvement and Accommodation During Obstetric Emergencies in Rural Ghana: A Qualitative Analysis.

William T Story, Clare Barrington, Corinne Fordham, Sodzi Sodzi-Tettey, Pierre M Barker, Kavita Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William T Storyassistant professor, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA, william-story@uiowa.edu.
Clare Barrington
Corinne Fordham
Sodzi Sodzi-Tettey
Pierre M Barker
Kavita Singh
Institute for Healthcare Improvement · USAssociation of Maternal and Child Health Programs · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAlthough men potentially play an important role in emergency obstetric care in Sub-Saharan Africa, few studies have examined the ways in which men are involved in such emergencies, the consequences of their involvement or the degree to which health facilities accommodate men.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 39 mothers and fathers in two districts in Northern and Central Ghana who had experienced obstetric emergencies, such as severe birth complications, to obtain narratives about those experiences. In addition, interviews with six health facility workers and eight focus group discussions with community members were conducted. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive analytic approach.

resultsAlthough some men had not been involved at all during their partner's obstetric emergency, two-thirds had provided some combination of financial, emotional and instrumental support. On the other hand, several men had acted as gatekeepers, and their control of resources and decisions had resulted in care-seeking delays. Although many respondents reported that health facilities accommodated male partners (e.g., by providing an appropriate space for men during delivery), others found that facilities were not accommodating, in some cases ignoring or disrespecting men. A few respondents had encountered improper staff expectations, notably that men would accompany their partner to the facility, a requirement that limits women's autonomy and delays care.

conclusionsPolicies and programs should promote supportive behavior by men during obstetric emergencies while empowering women. Health facility policies regarding accommodation of men during obstetric emergencies need to consider women's and men's preferences. Research should examine whether particular forms of support improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultDelivery, ObstetricEmergency Medical ServicesFathersFemaleGhanaHumansMaleObstetric Labor ComplicationsPaternal BehaviorPregnancySpousesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28825900
PMCPMC6771418
OpenAlexW2597282441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.