Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825703›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

Virtual reality for freely moving animals.

John R Stowers, Maximilian Hofbauer, Renaud Bastien, Johannes Griessner, Peter Higgins, Sarfarazhussain Farooqui, Ruth M Fischer, Karin Nowikovsky, Wulf Haubensak, Iain D Couzin and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social Preference Tests in Zebrafish: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Coevolutionary attack and avoidance strategies in predators and grouping prey.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Spectral preferences of mosquitos are altered by odors.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The fruit fly,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Information consumption and firm size.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John R StowersResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian HofbauerResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Renaud BastienDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.
Johannes GriessnerResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-1996
Peter HigginsResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Sarfarazhussain FarooquiMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ruth M FischerMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin NowikovskyMedizinische Universität Wien, Dept. for Internal Medicine I, Wien, Austria.
Wulf HaubensakResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-9184
Iain D CouzinDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.
Kristin Tessmar-RaibleMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-1741
Andrew D StrawResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-0858
Research Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Konstanz · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28970Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard animal behavior paradigms incompletely mimic nature and thus limit our understanding of behavior and brain function. Virtual reality (VR) can help, but it poses challenges. Typical VR systems require movement restrictions but disrupt sensorimotor experience, causing neuronal and behavioral alterations. We report the development of FreemoVR, a VR system for freely moving animals. We validate immersive VR for mice, flies, and zebrafish. FreemoVR allows instant, disruption-free environmental reconfigurations and interactions between real organisms and computer-controlled agents. Using the FreemoVR platform, we established a height-aversion assay in mice and studied visuomotor effects in Drosophila and zebrafish. Furthermore, by photorealistically mimicking zebrafish we discovered that effective social influence depends on a prospective leader balancing its internally preferred directional choice with social interaction. FreemoVR technology facilitates detailed investigations into neural function and behavior through the precise manipulation of sensorimotor feedback loops in unrestrained animals.

Indexed as

Motor ActivitySpatial BehaviorUser-Computer InterfaceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28825703
PMCPMC6485657
OpenAlexW2746560897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.