Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825622›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

FANCD2 and DNA Damage.

Manoj Nepal, Raymond Che, Chi Ma, Jun Zhang, Peiwen Fei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA Methylation in Alcohol Use Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manoj NepalCancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Mnepal@cc.hawaii.edu.
Raymond CheCancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. rche@hawaii.edu.
Chi MaCancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. cma@cc.hawaii.edu.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. zhang.jun@mayo.edu.
Peiwen FeiCancer Biology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. pfei@cc.hawaii.edu.

Funding

Molecular Insights into the Fanconi Anemia Tumor Suppressor Signaling PathwayR01CA188251 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI FEI, PEIWEN · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Roles of the Fanconi Anemia Pathway in Bladder TumorigenesisR01CA136532 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FEI, PEIWEN · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136532NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigators have dedicated considerable effort to understanding the molecular basis underlying Fanconi Anemia (FA), a rare human genetic disease featuring an extremely high incidence of cancer and many congenital defects. Among those studies, FA group D2 protein (FANCD2) has emerged as the focal point of FA signaling and plays crucial roles in multiple aspects of cellular life, especially in the cellular responses to DNA damage. Here, we discuss the recent and relevant studies to provide an updated review on the roles of FANCD2 in the DNA damage response.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairFanconi AnemiaFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinHumansSignal TransductionFANCD2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 Proteincancer and agingcheckpointDNA damage repairFANCD2Fanconi anemia

Identifiers

PMID28825622
PMCPMC5578191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.