Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825424›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2017

Checklist for One Health Epidemiological Reporting of Evidence (COHERE).

Meghan F Davis, Shelley C Rankin, Janna M Schurer, Stephen Cole, Lisa Conti, Peter Rabinowitz, COHERE Expert Review Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biosecurity measures reducingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence of Antibiotic Use and Disposal at Household Level in Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Meghan F DavisDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shelley C RankinDepartment of Pathobiology, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Janna M SchurerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephen ColeDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa ContiFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, FL, USA.
Peter RabinowitzDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, USA.
COHERE Expert Review Group
University of Washington · USUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · USDuke University · USEcoHealth Alliance · USFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · USJohns Hopkins University · USMurdoch University · AUPrinceton University · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Effects of pest and pet animal microbiota on child microbiota and asthma: a one health studyK01OD019918 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MEGHAN F. · 2016 to 2020
$621k
NIH HHS K01 OD019918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One Health is defined as the intersection and integration of knowledge regarding humans, animals, and the environment, yet as the One Health scientific literature expands, there is considerable heterogeneity of approach and quality of reporting in One Health studies. In addition, many researchers who publish such studies do not include or integrate data from all three domains of human, animal, and environmental health. This points to a critical need to unify guidelines for One Health studies. This report details the Checklist for One Health Epidemiological Reporting of Evidence (COHERE) to guide the design and publication format of future One Health studies. COHERE was developed by a core writing team and international expert review group that represents multiple disciplines, including human medicine, veterinary medicine, public health, allied professionals, clinical laboratory science, epidemiology, the social sciences, ecohealth and environmental health. The twin aims of the COHERE standards are to 1) improve the quality of reporting of observational or interventional epidemiological studies that collect and integrate data from humans, animals and/or vectors, and their environments; and 2) promote the concept that One Health studies should integrate knowledge from these three domains. The 19 standards in the COHERE checklist address descriptions of human populations, animal populations, environmental assessment, spatial and temporal relationships of data from the three domains, integration of analyses and interpretation, and inclusion of expertise in the research team from disciplines related to human health, animal health, and environmental health.

Indexed as

Environmental healthEpidemiologyObservational studiesOne HealthReporting guidelines

Identifiers

PMID28825424
PMCPMC5536878
OpenAlexW2734939206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.