Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825369›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2018

Nondestructive/Noninvasive Imaging Evaluation of Cellular Differentiation Progression During In Vitro Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Chondrogenesis.

Diego Correa, Rodrigo A Somoza, Arnold I Caplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Habitat Assay, a Platform to StudyTissue engineering. Part A · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human mesenchymal stem cells induced to differentiate as chondrocytes follow a biphasic pattern of extracellular matrix production.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego Correa1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, and Center for Multimodal Evaluation of Engineered Cartilage, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.
Rodrigo A Somoza1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, and Center for Multimodal Evaluation of Engineered Cartilage, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.
Arnold I Caplan1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, and Center for Multimodal Evaluation of Engineered Cartilage, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

TR&D-4: Growing Tissue in the Scalable, Modular, Automated, and Closed (SMAC) FoundryP41EB021911 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JEAN F WELTER · 2016 to 2026
$13.9M
CWRU Center for Multimodal Evaluation of Engineered CartilageR01EB020367 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPLAN, ARNOLD IRWIN · 2014 to 2015
$807k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB021911NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrogenic cell differentiation constitutes a multistep program that is spatially and temporally modulated by combinations of bioactive factors that drives the establishment of specific cellular phenotypes. This sequence of events results in the fabrication of a distinctive structural and functional extracellular matrix which determines the quality of the cartilaginous tissue and, thus, its potential in vivo implantability as a tissue-engineered implant. Current assessments of engineered cartilage rely on destructive methodologies typically applied at the end of the fabrication period that make it difficult to predict failures early in the process. The high inherent variability of engineered tissues raises questions regarding reproducibility and the validity of using such end-stage representative samples to characterize an entire batch of engineered tissues. Therefore, the development of dynamic, multimodal, nondestructive, and noninvasive technology toolsets to monitor cell differentiation (and secondarily tissue phenotypes) in real time is of paramount importance. In this study, we report the creation of cell-based probes to directly interrogate cell differentiation events during in vitro chondrogenesis and in vivo osteogenesis. For that, native promoters of well-established chondrogenic (Sex Determining Region Y-Box 9 [Sox9] and Aggrecan [AGG]) and osteogenic (Osteocalcin [OC]) differentiation biomarkers were used to create independent probes incorporating a traceable signal (Luciferase) and transduced into human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The probes were used to monitor the progression throughout in vitro chondrogenic differentiation program in aggregate (pellet) cultures and in vivo osteogenic differentiation in heterotopic ossicles. These tissue differentiation constructs were positively tested in conditions known to modulate the differentiation program at various phases that confirmed their sensitivity and reproducibility. This technology toolset allows a nondestructive and noninvasive, imaging-based longitudinal reconstruction of the in vitro chondrogenic differentiation program, while providing an analytical assessment of phenotypic changes of engineered cartilage in real time.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisDiagnostic ImagingFibroblastsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisbioluminescencecell-based probeschondrogenesisdifferentiationMSCs

Identifiers

PMID28825369
PMCPMC5905945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.