ArticleInternational ophthalmology2018
Presumed autoimmune retinopathy following chickenpox; a case report.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report a case of presumed autoimmune retinopathy in a patient who had been diagnosed with chickenpox immediately prior to symptom onset.
methodThis is a retrospective case report with fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
resultsA 29-year-old immunocompetent man presented with a two-month history of photopsia and a bluish light predominantly in the left eye with onset immediately following a diagnosis of chickenpox. He subsequently developed blurring of vision in his left eye with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showing disruption and loss of ellipsoid layer in a perivascular pattern in both eyes with fundus autofluorescence demonstrating an abnormal increase in autofluorescence predominately around the vascular arcades. Autoimmune retinopathy was suspected on the basis of the clinical presentation, electrophysiology, absence of fundus lesions, retinal degenerations or dystrophies, or intraocular inflammation and temporal association with varicella infection. Antiretinal antibody testing with Western blot and immunohistochemistry were reported to be negative, however, given the consistent evidence from all other aspects of workup and investigation the patient was commenced on a trial of prednisone. This resulted in marked reduction in photopsia and expansion of visual fields.
conclusionThe diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy is ultimately clinical in nature. Despite the absence of positive retinal autoantibodies, a diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy was made based upon consistent evidence from all other aspects of workup and investigation. This allowed prompt treatment with immunosuppressive agents with subsequent stabilization of this patient's visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.