Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28825060›Full record

ArticleResearch in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- )2014

Traversing the

Y William Yu, Deniz Yorukoglu, Bonnie Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- ), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving Bloom Filter Performance on Sequence Data Using k-mer Bloom Filters.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. QVZ: lossy compression of quality values.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A cluster-based approach to compression of Quality Scores.Proceedings. Data Compression Conference
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y William YuMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USA http://people.csail.mit.edu/bab/.
Deniz YorukogluMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USA http://people.csail.mit.edu/bab/.
Bonnie BergerMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USA http://people.csail.mit.edu/bab/.

Funding

Compressive genomics for large omics data sets: Algorithms applications & toolsR01GM108348 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2013 to 2019
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly impractical to indefinitely store raw sequencing data for later processing in an uncompressed state. In this paper, we describe a scalable compressive framework, Read-Quality-Sparsifier (RQS), which substantially outperforms the compression ratio and speed of other de novo quality score compression methods while maintaining SNP-calling accuracy. Surprisingly, RQS also improves the SNP-calling accuracy on a gold-standard, real-life sequencing dataset (NA12878) using a AVAILABILITY: An implementation of our method, RQS, is available for download at: http://rqs.csail.mit.edu/.

Indexed as

accuracycompressionquality scoreRQSsparsificationvariant calling

Identifiers

PMID28825060
PMCPMC5558603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.