ArticleInternational journal of care and caring2017
Family care work: a policy-relevant research agenda.
Article in International journal of care and caring, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Lived Experiences of Caregiving for Older Family Members by Young Caregivers in Singapore: Transition, Trials, and Tribulations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Cohort Trajectories by Age and Gender for Informal Caregiving in Europe Adjusted for Sociodemographic Changes, 2004 and 2015.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023Article
- Educational Attainment Differences in Attitudes toward Provisions of IADL Care for Older Adults in the U.S.Journal of aging & social policy · 2022Article
- Something's Gotta Give: The Relationship Between Time in Eldercare, Time in Childcare, and Employee Wellbeing.Journal of aging and health · 2022Article
- Life Course Pathways Into Intergenerational Caregiving.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022Article
- The Paid and Unpaid Working Life Expectancy at 50 in Europe.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022Article
- Family Care Availability And Implications For Informal And Formal Care Used By Adults With Dementia In The US.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2021Article
- Medical Device Workarounds in Providing Care for Children With Medical Complexity in the Home.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Intergenerational Relationships, Family Caregiving Policy, and COVID-19 in the United States.Journal of aging & social policyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article addresses the need for policy-relevant research agendas on family care in transaction with formal care and public as well as organisational norms and policies in light of the crisis in caregiving for older adults. We propose a combined institutional and life-course theoretical approach, suggesting seven ways of organising scholarly enquiry to promote understanding of the changing nature of family care in the 21st century, inform policymakers' efforts at supporting family caregivers and improve caregivers' and care recipients' quality of life. These include: (1) moving beyond snapshots of individuals; (2) conducting comparative cross-cultural and crosscohort analyses; (3) documenting social heterogeneity, vulnerability and inequality; (4) capturing individuals' and families' adaptive strategies and cycles of control during the caregiving process; (5) investigating policy innovations and natural experiments; (6) assessing third parties as mediating institutions between regulatory environments and caregiving families; and (7) attending to the subjective meanings of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.