Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824872›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2017

Clinical Validity and Utility of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Routine Clinical Practice for Breast Cancer Patients: Current and Future Directions.

Lironne Wein, Peter Savas, Stephen J Luen, Balaji Virassamy, Roberto Salgado, Sherene Loi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05250336 (Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Programmed Cell Death - Ligand 1 in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05250336 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Programmed Cell Death - Ligand 1 in Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsBreast Cancer, Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1ArmsObservational Study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (UPDATE 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tumor Hypoxia: How Conventional Histology Is Reshaped in Breast Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lironne WeinPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter SavasPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen J LuenPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Balaji VirassamyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Roberto SalgadoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sherene LoiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer has grown in recent years. Biomarkers must undergo comprehensive evaluation in terms of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility before they can be accepted as part of clinical practice. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group has developed a practice guideline on scoring TILs in breast cancer in order to standardize TIL assessment. The prognostic value of TILs as a biomarker in early-stage breast cancer has been established by assessing tumor samples in thousands of patients from large prospective clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. There is a strong linear relationship between increase in TILs and improved disease-free survival for triple-negative and HER2-positive disease. Higher levels of TILs have also been associated with increased rates of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. TILs have potential clinical utility in breast cancer in a number of areas. These include prediction of responders to immune checkpoint blockade, identification of primary HER2-positive and triple-negative patients who have excellent prognoses and may thus be appropriate for treatment de-escalation, and potentially incorporation into a neoadjuvant endpoint which may be a better surrogate maker for drug development.

Indexed as

antitumor immunitybreast cancercancer biomarkerscheckpoint inhibitorstumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID28824872
PMCPMC5540942
OpenAlexW2740214522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.