ArticleIMA fungus2017
A plant pathology perspective of fungal genome sequencing.
Article in IMA fungus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Solanaceous vegetables andHorticulture research · 2026Article
- Integrated taxonomy and genomic analysis of Marssonina zanthoxyli, the causal agent of prickly ash leaf defoliation.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- FcLRR1 Regulates Hyphal Growth and Plant Infection inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis towards the identification of genome wide characteristics of a beneficial fungal endophyte.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Machine-learning-based analysis of host-depletedBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Plant-pathogen interactions: making the case for multi-omics analysis of complex pathosystems.Stress biology · 2025Review
- Unique trajectory of gene family evolution from genomic analysis of nearly all known species in an ancient yeast lineage.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- Multilayered defense responses in sugarcane againstFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genomics in plant pathogen identification and control.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Nanopore Data-Driven T2T Genome Assemblies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Repeat-induced point mutations driving Parastagonospora nodorum genomic diversity are balanced by selection against non-synonymous mutations.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Deciphering the Genomic Landscape and Virulence Mechanisms of the Wheat Powdery Mildew PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pan-genome survey ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Tapping Culture Collections for Fungal Endophytes: First Genome Assemblies for Three Genera and Five Species in the Ascomycota.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- The mitogenomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The pangenome of the wheat pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis reveals novel transposons associated with necrotrophic effectors ToxA and ToxB.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Current Status and Future Perspectives of Genomics Research in the Rust Fungi.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- De Novo Long-Read Whole-Genome Assemblies and the Comparative Pan-Genome Analysis of Ascochyta Blight Pathogens Affecting Field Pea.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of plant pathogens are fungi and many of these adversely affect food security. This mini-review aims to provide an analysis of the plant pathogenic fungi for which genome sequences are publically available, to assess their general genome characteristics, and to consider how genomics has impacted plant pathology. A list of sequenced fungal species was assembled, the taxonomy of all species verified, and the potential reason for sequencing each of the species considered. The genomes of 1090 fungal species are currently (October 2016) in the public domain and this number is rapidly rising. Pathogenic species comprised the largest category (35.5 %) and, amongst these, plant pathogens are predominant. Of the 191 plant pathogenic fungal species with available genomes, 61.3 % cause diseases on food crops, more than half of which are staple crops. The genomes of plant pathogens are slightly larger than those of other fungal species sequenced to date and they contain fewer coding sequences in relation to their genome size. Both of these factors can be attributed to the expansion of repeat elements. Sequenced genomes of plant pathogens provide blueprints from which potential virulence factors were identified and from which genes associated with different pathogenic strategies could be predicted. Genome sequences have also made it possible to evaluate adaptability of pathogen genomes and genomic regions that experience selection pressures. Some genomic patterns, however, remain poorly understood and plant pathogen genomes alone are not sufficient to unravel complex pathogen-host interactions. Genomes, therefore, cannot replace experimental studies that can be complex and tedious. Ultimately, the most promising application lies in using fungal plant pathogen genomics to inform disease management and risk assessment strategies. This will ultimately minimize the risks of future disease outbreaks and assist in preparation for emerging pathogen outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.