Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824836›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2017

A plant pathology perspective of fungal genome sequencing.

Janneke Aylward, Emma T Steenkamp, Léanne L Dreyer, Francois Roets, Brenda D Wingfield, Michael J Wingfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Solanaceous vegetables andHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. FcLRR1 Regulates Hyphal Growth and Plant Infection inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multilayered defense responses in sugarcane againstFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Nanopore Data-Driven T2T Genome Assemblies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pan-genome survey ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The mitogenomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janneke AylwardDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Emma T SteenkampDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Léanne L DreyerDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Francois RoetsDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Brenda D WingfieldDepartment of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Michael J WingfieldDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of plant pathogens are fungi and many of these adversely affect food security. This mini-review aims to provide an analysis of the plant pathogenic fungi for which genome sequences are publically available, to assess their general genome characteristics, and to consider how genomics has impacted plant pathology. A list of sequenced fungal species was assembled, the taxonomy of all species verified, and the potential reason for sequencing each of the species considered. The genomes of 1090 fungal species are currently (October 2016) in the public domain and this number is rapidly rising. Pathogenic species comprised the largest category (35.5 %) and, amongst these, plant pathogens are predominant. Of the 191 plant pathogenic fungal species with available genomes, 61.3 % cause diseases on food crops, more than half of which are staple crops. The genomes of plant pathogens are slightly larger than those of other fungal species sequenced to date and they contain fewer coding sequences in relation to their genome size. Both of these factors can be attributed to the expansion of repeat elements. Sequenced genomes of plant pathogens provide blueprints from which potential virulence factors were identified and from which genes associated with different pathogenic strategies could be predicted. Genome sequences have also made it possible to evaluate adaptability of pathogen genomes and genomic regions that experience selection pressures. Some genomic patterns, however, remain poorly understood and plant pathogen genomes alone are not sufficient to unravel complex pathogen-host interactions. Genomes, therefore, cannot replace experimental studies that can be complex and tedious. Ultimately, the most promising application lies in using fungal plant pathogen genomics to inform disease management and risk assessment strategies. This will ultimately minimize the risks of future disease outbreaks and assist in preparation for emerging pathogen outbreaks.

Indexed as

genome sizepathogen evolutionpathogen lifestyleplant pathology

Identifiers

PMID28824836
PMCPMC5493528
OpenAlexW2587330106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.