Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824765›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2017

Resident and Preceptor Perceptions of Preceptor Integration Into Resident Clinic Scheduling Templates.

Halle G Sobel, Rachel Swigris, Karen M Chacko, Alison Landrey, Monica McNulty, Kaitlyn Vennard, Susan Michelle Nikels, Kathleen Suddarth, Edward N Murphy, Eva Aagaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Resident as Preceptor: An Ambulatory Internal Medicine Curriculum for Third-Year Resident Precepting.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Halle G Sobel
Rachel Swigris
Karen M Chacko
Alison Landrey
Monica McNulty
Kaitlyn Vennard
Susan Michelle Nikels
Kathleen Suddarth
Edward N Murphy
Eva Aagaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome internal medicine residency programs on X+Y schedules have modified clinic preceptor schedules to mimic those of the resident cohort (resident matched). This is in contrast to a traditional model, in which preceptors supervise on the same half-day each week.

objectiveWe assessed preceptor and resident perceptions of the 2 precepting models.

methodsWe surveyed 44 preceptors and 97 residents at 3 clinic sites in 2 academic medical centers. Two clinics used the resident-matched model, and 1 used a traditional model. Surveys were completed at 6 months and 1 year. We assessed resident and preceptor perceptions in 5 domains: relationships between residents and preceptors; preceptor familiarity with complex patients; preceptor ability to assess milestone achievements; ability to follow up on results; and quality of care.

resultsThere was no difference in perceptions of interpersonal relationships or satisfaction with patient care. Preceptors in the resident-matched schedule reported they were more familiar with complex patients at both 6 months and 1 year, and felt more comfortable evaluating residents' milestone achievements at 6 months, but not at 1 year. At 1 year, residents in the resident-matched model perceived preceptors were more familiar with complex patients than residents in the traditional model. The ability to discuss patient results between clinic weeks was low in both models.

conclusionsThe resident-matched model increased resident and preceptor perceptions of familiarity with complex patients and early preceptor perceptions of comfort in assessment of milestone achievements.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPreceptorshipAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansInternal MedicinePerception

Identifiers

PMID28824765
PMCPMC5559247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.