Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824728›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2017

Constantin Lapa, Maria J Garcia-Velloso, Katharina Lückerath, Samuel Samnick, Martin Schreder, Paula Rodriguez Otero, Jan-Stefan Schmid, Ken Herrmann, Stefan Knop, Andreas K Buck and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM guidelines on the use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Minimal residual disease assessment and progress in multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  7. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Metabolic kinetic modeling of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  9. Head-to-Head Comparison between FDG andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. A new concept for the production ofEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2022
    Article
  15. Initial evaluation of [EJNMMI research · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Reduced splenic uptake onTheranostics · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  20. MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Constantin LapaUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Maria J Garcia-VellosoClinica Universidad de Navarra, Center of Applied Medical Research, Navarra Institute for Health Research (CIMA). IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Katharina LückerathUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Samuel SamnickUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin SchrederUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Würzburg, Germany.
Paula Rodriguez OteroClinica Universidad de Navarra, Center of Applied Medical Research, Navarra Institute for Health Research (CIMA). IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Jan-Stefan SchmidUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Ken HerrmannUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan KnopUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas K BuckUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
Hermann EinseleUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Würzburg, Germany.
Jesus San-MiguelClinica Universidad de Navarra, Center of Applied Medical Research, Navarra Institute for Health Research (CIMA). IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Klaus Martin KortümUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESEssen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological FactorsCarbon RadioisotopesChelating AgentsGermanyGlucose-6-PhosphateHumansIsotope LabelingMethionineMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographySensitivity and SpecificitySpain2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphateBiological FactorsCarbon-11Carbon RadioisotopesChelating AgentsGlucose-6-PhosphateMethionine11C-methionineFDG.multiple myelomaPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID28824728
PMCPMC5562228
OpenAlexW2739614864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.