Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824594›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017

Advances in Developing Therapies to Combat Zika Virus: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Ashok Munjal, Rekha Khandia, Kuldeep Dhama, Swati Sachan, Kumaragurubaran Karthik, Ruchi Tiwari, Yashpal S Malik, Deepak Kumar, Raj K Singh, Hafiz M N Iqbal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. West Nile virus unmasked: from gene variability to future challenges.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. An Overview of Zika Virus and Zika Virus Induced Neuropathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Innate Defense in the Zika-Infected Placenta.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Natural products as Zika antivirals.Medicinal research reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashok MunjalDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah UniversityBhopal, India.
Rekha KhandiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah UniversityBhopal, India.
Kuldeep DhamaDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research InstituteBareilly, India.
Swati SachanImmunology Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research InstituteBareilly, India.
Kumaragurubaran KarthikCentral University Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityChennai, India.
Ruchi TiwariDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Sciences, UP Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalay Evum Go-Anusandhan SansthanMathura, India.
Yashpal S MalikDivision of Biological Standardization, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research InstituteBareilly, India.
Deepak KumarDivision of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research InstituteBareilly, India.
Raj K SinghICAR-Indian Veterinary Research InstituteBareilly, India.
Hafiz M N IqbalSchool of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus MonterreyMonterrey, Mexico.
Sunil K JoshiCellular Immunology Lab, Frank Reidy Research Center of Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, NorfolkVA, United States.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INBarkatullah University · INOld Dominion University · USTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go-Anusandhan Sansthan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) remained largely quiescent for nearly six decades after its first appearance in 1947. ZIKV reappeared after 2007, resulting in a declaration of an international "public health emergency" in 2016 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Until this time, ZIKV was considered to induce only mild illness, but it has now been established as the cause of severe clinical manifestations, including fetal anomalies, neurological problems, and autoimmune disorders. Infection during pregnancy can cause congenital brain abnormalities, including microcephaly and neurological degeneration, and in other cases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, making infections with ZIKV a substantial public health concern. Genomic and molecular investigations are underway to investigate ZIKV pathology and its recent enhanced pathogenicity, as well as to design safe and potent vaccines, drugs, and therapeutics. This review describes progress in the design and development of various anti-ZIKV therapeutics, including drugs targeting virus entry into cells and the helicase protein, nucleosides, inhibitors of NS3 protein, small molecules, methyltransferase inhibitors, interferons, repurposed drugs, drugs designed with the aid of computers, neutralizing antibodies, convalescent serum, antibodies that limit antibody-dependent enhancement, and herbal medicines. Additionally, covalent inhibitors of viral protein expression and anti-Toll-like receptor molecules are discussed. To counter ZIKV-associated disease, we need to make rapid progress in developing novel therapies that work effectually to inhibit ZIKV.

Indexed as

drugsGuillain-Barré SyndromemicrocephalytherapiesZika virus

Identifiers

PMID28824594
PMCPMC5541032
OpenAlexW2738424506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.