Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28824405›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Representation of Semantic Similarity in the Left Intraparietal Sulcus: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence.

Veerle Neyens, Rose Bruffaerts, Antonietta G Liuzzi, Ioannis Kalfas, Ronald Peeters, Emmanuel Keuleers, Rufin Vogels, Simon De Deyne, Gert Storms, Patrick Dupont and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Hippocampal Functions Modulate Transfer-Appropriate Cortical Representations Supporting Subsequent Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scene context shapes category representational geometry during processing of tools.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Veerle NeyensLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Rose BruffaertsLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Antonietta G LiuzziLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Ioannis KalfasLaboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Ronald PeetersRadiology Department, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Emmanuel KeuleersDepartment of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg UniversityNetherlands.
Rufin VogelsLaboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Simon De DeyneHumanities and Social Sciences Group, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Gert StormsHumanities and Social Sciences Group, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Patrick DupontLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Rik VandenbergheLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to a recent study, semantic similarity between concrete entities correlates with the similarity of activity patterns in left middle IPS during category naming. We examined the replicability of this effect under passive viewing conditions, the potential role of visuoperceptual similarity, where the effect is situated compared to regions that have been previously implicated in visuospatial attention, and how it compares to effects of object identity and location. Forty-six subjects participated. Subjects passively viewed pictures from two categories, musical instruments and vehicles. Semantic similarity between entities was estimated based on a concept-feature matrix obtained in more than 1,000 subjects. Visuoperceptual similarity was modeled based on the HMAX model, the AlexNet deep convolutional learning model, and thirdly, based on subjective visuoperceptual similarity ratings. Among the IPS regions examined, only left middle IPS showed a semantic similarity effect. The effect was significant in hIP1, hIP2, and hIP3. Visuoperceptual similarity did not correlate with similarity of activity patterns in left middle IPS. The semantic similarity effect in left middle IPS was significantly stronger than in the right middle IPS and also stronger than in the left or right posterior IPS. The semantic similarity effect was similar to that seen in the angular gyrus. Object identity effects were much more widespread across nearly all parietal areas examined. Location effects were relatively specific for posterior IPS and area 7 bilaterally. To conclude, the current findings replicate the semantic similarity effect in left middle IPS under passive viewing conditions, and demonstrate its anatomical specificity within a cytoarchitectonic reference frame. We propose that the semantic similarity effect in left middle IPS reflects the transient uploading of semantic representations in working memory.

Indexed as

geonintraparietal sulcusmulti-voxel pattern analysisobject identityrepresentational similarity analysissemantic processing

Identifiers

PMID28824405
PMCPMC5543089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.