ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2017
Measuring and Improving Physician Knowledge of Safety Risks Using Traditional and Online Methods in Pharmacovigilance.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personal Formularies of Primary Care Physicians Across 4 Health Care Systems.JAMA network open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional methods for assessing prescriber knowledge can take several years to deliver results. This study was undertaken to obtain insights into the potential for using existing online communities to educate prescribers on therapy-related safety risks.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe approaches to measuring prescribers' knowledge of safety risk (osteonecrosis of the jaw) outlined in the European Medicine Agency's summary of product characteristics for denosumab (XGEVA
methodsShort multiple-choice online instruments were administered as (1) a two-round cross-sectional survey fielded in January 2013-May 2015 (traditional, nine European countries, study duration: 3 years), (2) a survey targeting the online Medscape community (seven European countries, study duration: 3 weeks), and (3) a continuing medical education module with pre-/post-assessment in an online Medscape community (Medscape Education, USA). All respondents were oncologists; treated five or more patients with bone metastases from solid tumours in the previous 3 months; and prescribed denosumab within the previous 12 months. Medscape (a WebMD company, New York, NY, USA) is the leading online medical information resource, serving approximately 3 million physicians worldwide and 400,000 within Europe.
resultsIn the traditional 29-month study, 420 (
conclusionsAssessments that target physicians through online platforms where they seek information about drug-related safety risks may result in increased efficiencies, informing regulators about prescribers' knowledge of safe use within weeks rather than years. Online communities or professional societies may provide venues in which to implement knowledge-acquisition surveys tied to training/education modules that address safety topics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.