Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28823927›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

Development and rationale for a multifactorial, randomized controlled trial to test strategies to promote adherence to complex drug regimens among older adults.

Stacy Cooper Bailey, Guisselle A Wismer, Ruth M Parker, Surrey M Walton, Alastair J J Wood, Amisha Wallia, Samantha A Brokenshire, Alexandra C Infanzon, Laura M Curtis, Mary J Kwasny and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stacy Cooper BaileyDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. Electronic address: scbailey@unc.edu.
Guisselle A WismerHealth Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Ruth M ParkerDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Surrey M WaltonDepartment of Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Alastair J J WoodDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Amisha WalliaDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Samantha A BrokenshireDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Alexandra C InfanzonDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Laura M CurtisHealth Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mary J KwasnyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Michael S WolfHealth Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEmory University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
A Universal Medication Schedule to Promote Adherence to Complex Drug RegimensR01AG046352 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAILEY, STACY C, WOLF, MICHAEL S · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic conditions are often responsible for self-managing complex, multi-drug regimens with minimal professional clinical support. While numerous interventions to promote and support medication adherence have been tested, most have had limited success or have been too resource-intensive for real-world implementation.

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of multiple low-cost, technology-enabled strategies, alone and in combination, for promoting medication regimen adherence among older adults.

methodsOlder, English or Spanish-speaking patients on complex drug regimens (N=1505) will be recruited from a community health system in Chicago, IL. Enrolled patients will be randomized to one of four study arms, receiving either: 1) enhanced usual care alone; 2) daily medication reminders via SMS text messages; 3) medication monitoring via a patient portal-based assessment; or 4) both SMS text message reminders and portal-based medication monitoring. The primary outcome of the study is medication adherence, which will be assessed via multiple measures at baseline, 2months, and 6months. The effect of intervention strategies on clinical markers (hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, cholesterol level), as well as intervention fidelity and the barriers and costs of implementation will also be evaluated.

conclusionsThis randomized controlled trial will evaluate the impact of various low-cost intervention strategies on adherence to complex medication regimens and will explore barriers to implementation. If the studied intervention strategies are shown to be effective, then these approaches could be effectively deployed across a diverse range of clinical settings and patient populations. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis trial is registered on clinicaltrials.govNCT02820753.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPatient PortalsResearch DesignText MessagingAgedBlood PressureCholesterolCost-Benefit AnalysisElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedReminder SystemsSafety-net ProvidersCholesterolGlycated HemoglobinChronic conditionsHealth literacyMedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID28823927
PMCPMC5641260
OpenAlexW2746995956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.