Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28823748›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2018

Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

Sigal Trattner, Sandra Halliburton, Carla M Thompson, Yanping Xu, Anjali Chelliah, Sachin R Jambawalikar, Boyu Peng, M Robert Peters, Jill E Jacobs, Munir Ghesani and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04631809 (Computer tomoGRaphy guidEd invasivE Coronary Angiography in patiEnts With a Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04631809 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Computer tomoGRaphy guidEd invasivE Coronary Angiography in patiEnts With a Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of PatrasRan2020 to 2022Enrolled225ConditionsCoronary Artery Bypass SurgeryArmsCoronary angiography +/- percutaneous coronary intervention, CT-Coronary Angiography + Coronary angiography +/- percutaneous coronary intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sigal TrattnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Sandra HalliburtonImaging Institute, Division of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, and Lerner Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, and Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, and Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio.
Carla M ThompsonImaging Institute, Division of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, and Lerner Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, and Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Yanping XuRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Irvington, New York.
Anjali ChelliahDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Sachin R JambawalikarDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Boyu PengDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
M Robert PetersAdvanced Cardiovascular Imaging, New York, New York.
Jill E JacobsSection of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, and New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Munir GhesaniDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York University, and New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
James J JangDivision of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, California.
Hussein Al-KhalidiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Andrew J EinsteinDepartment of Medicine, Cardiology Division, and Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. Electronic address: andrew.einstein@columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USAdvanced Radiation Centers of New York · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCleveland State University · USClinical Research Institute · USKaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center · US

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Substudy to Assess for Effective Dose of RadiationR01HL109711 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EINSTEIN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to determine updated conversion factors (k-factors) that would enable accurate estimation of radiation effective dose (ED) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and calcium scoring performed on 12 contemporary scanner models and current clinical cardiac protocols and to compare these methods to the standard chest k-factor of 0.014 mSv·mGy

backgroundAccurate estimation of ED from cardiac CT scans is essential to meaningfully compare the benefits and risks of different cardiac imaging strategies and optimize test and protocol selection. Presently, ED from cardiac CT is generally estimated by multiplying a scanner-reported parameter, the dose-length product, by a k-factor which was determined for noncardiac chest CT, using single-slice scanners and a superseded definition of ED.

methodsMetal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor radiation detectors were positioned in organs of anthropomorphic phantoms, which were scanned using all cardiac protocols, 120 clinical protocols in total, on 12 CT scanners representing the spectrum of scanners from 5 manufacturers (GE, Hitachi, Philips, Siemens, Toshiba). Organ doses were determined for each protocol, and ED was calculated as defined in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103. Effective doses and scanner-reported dose-length products were used to determine k-factors for each scanner model and protocol.

resultsk-Factors averaged 0.026 mSv·mGy

conclusionsCardiac k-factors for all scanners and protocols are considerably higher than the k-factor currently used to estimate ED of cardiac CT studies, suggesting that radiation doses from cardiac CT have been significantly and systematically underestimated. Using cardiac-specific factors can more accurately inform the benefit-risk calculus of cardiac-imaging strategies.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedComputed Tomography AngiographyComputer SimulationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsEquipment DesignHumansPhantoms, ImagingPredictive Value of TestsVascular Calcificationcardiac computed tomographyconversion factorsradiation dose

Identifiers

PMID28823748
PMCPMC5756125
OpenAlexW2750047913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.