Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28823011›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2018

Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?

Roland Linder, J Zeidler, F Verheyen, J-M Graf von der Schulenburg, A Haverich, T Schilling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roland LinderWissenschaftliches Institut der Techniker Krankenkasse (WINEG), Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305, Hamburg, Germany. prof.dr.roland.linder@wineg.de.
J ZeidlerCenter for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-2267
F VerheyenWissenschaftliches Institut der Techniker Krankenkasse (WINEG), Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305, Hamburg, Germany.
J-M Graf von der SchulenburgCenter for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
A HaverichDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
T SchillingDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Leibniz University Hannover · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechniker Krankenkasse (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The national guidelines for treatment of chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend surgical coronary aortic bypass grafting (CABG) rather than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with a coronary three-vessel disease. The epidemiology of three-vessel CHD and data about the application of different revascularisation strategies raise suspicion of deviation from the guidelines in the treatment of those patients. Claims data containing records of almost 10 million patients of the largest German statutory health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) were utilised to measure adherence to the guidelines for treatment of groups of patients with one-, two-, and three-vessel CHD, respectively. The impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on each patient's revascularisation procedure was investigated as well. There was no significant difference in the rate of PCI between the groups. In conclusion, the hypothesis that patients with a coronary three-vessel disease are not always treated according to the recommendations of the national guidelines could not be disproved by this study. Finally, the results of this study suggest that the best revascularisation strategy for each patient with two- and three-vessel disease should be decided upon by an interdisciplinary discussion between both cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleStentsTreatment OutcomeChronic coronary heart diseaseClaims dataCoronary aortic bypass graftingHealth services researchPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID28823011
OpenAlexW2748342461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.