Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28822996›Full record

Observational studyJAMA oncology2018

Examining Bias in Studies of Statin Treatment and Survival in Patients With Cancer.

Louise Emilsson, Xabier García-Albéniz, Roger W Logan, Ellen C Caniglia, Mette Kalager, Miguel A Hernán

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 121 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Statins and prognosis of female breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise EmilssonDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Xabier García-AlbénizDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Roger W LoganDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ellen C CanigliaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mette KalagerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Miguel A HernánDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DOMINICI, FRANCESCA, LIN, XIHONG · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
Evaluation of dynamic strategies of cancer careK99CA207730 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GARCIA DE ALBENIZ, XABIER ADRIAN · 2017 to 2017
$137k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA207730NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatients with cancer who use statins appear to have a substantially better survival than nonusers in observational studies. However, this inverse association between statin use and mortality may be due to selection bias and immortal-time bias.

objectiveTo emulate a randomized trial of statin therapy initiation that is free of selection bias and immortal-time bias. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe used observational data on 17 372 patients with cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2007-2009) with complete follow-up until 2011. The SEER-Medicare database links 17 US cancer registries and claims files from Medicare and Medicaid in 12 US states. We included individuals with a new diagnosis of colorectal, breast, prostate, or bladder cancer who had not been prescribed statins for at least 6 months before the cancer diagnosis. Individuals were duplicated, and each replicate was assigned to either the strategy "statin therapy initiation within 6 months after diagnosis" or "no statin therapy initiation." Replicates were censored when they stopped following their assigned strategy, and the potential selection bias was adjusted for via inverse-probability weighting. Hazard ratios (HRs), cumulative incidences, and risk differences were calculated for all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality. We then compared our estimates with those obtained using the same analytic approaches used in previous observational studies. EXPOSURES: Statin therapy initiation within 6 months after cancer diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cancer-specific and all-cause mortality using SEER-Medicare data and data from previous studies.

resultsOf the 17 372 patients whose data were analyzed, 8440 (49%) were men, and 8932 (51%) were women (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [7.4] years; range, 66-115 years). The adjusted HR (95% CI) comparing statin therapy initiation vs no initiation was 1.00 (0.88-1.15) for cancer-specific mortality and 1.07 (0.93-1.21) for overall mortality. Cumulative incidence curves for both groups were almost overlapping (the risk difference never exceeded 0.8%). In contrast, the methods used by prior studies resulted in an inverse association between statin use and mortality (pooled hazard ratio 0.69). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: After using methods that are not susceptible to selection bias from prevalent users and to immortal time bias, we found that initiation of therapy with statins within 6 months after cancer diagnosis did not appear to improve 3-year cancer-specific or overall survival.

Indexed as

BiasCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceMaleNeoplasmsPublication BiasPublicationsRegistriesSEER ProgramSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28822996
PMCPMC5790310
OpenAlexW2749616207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.