Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28822796›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2018

Papillary Ductal Plugging is a Mechanism for Early Stone Retention in Brushite Stone Disease.

James C Williams, Michael S Borofsky, Sharon B Bledsoe, Andrew P Evan, Fredric L Coe, Elaine M Worcester, James E Lingeman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James C WilliamsDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: jwillia3@iupui.edu.
Michael S BorofskyDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sharon B BledsoeDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Andrew P EvanDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Fredric L CoeSection of Nephrology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Elaine M WorcesterSection of Nephrology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
James E LingemanDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Indiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Chicago · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

SWL AND RENAL INJURY AND STONE COMMINUTIONP01DK043881 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAILEY, MICHAEL R · 1994 to 2023
$33.5M
ULTRASTRUCTURE AND CYTOMORPHOLOGY COREP30DK042086 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHANG, EUGENE B · 1990 to 2025
$29.8M
STONE FORMATION IN GENETIC HYPERCALCIURIAP01DK056788 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ASHKAR, TAREK MAURICE · 2000 to 2021
$22.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK043881NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK056788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMechanisms of early stone retention in the kidney are under studied and poorly understood. To date attachment via Randall's plaque is the only widely accepted theory in this regard, which is best described in idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers. Brushite stone formers are known to have distinct papillary morphology relative to calcium oxalate stone formers. As such we sought to determine whether stone attachment mechanisms in such patients may be similarly unique. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients undergoing percutaneous and or ureteroscopic procedures for stone removal consented to endoscopic renal papillary examination and individual stone collection. Each removed stone was processed using micro computerized tomography to assess the 3-dimensional microstructure and the minerals contained, and search for common structural features indicative of novel mechanisms of early growth and attachment to renal tissue.

resultsA total of 25 intact brushite stones were removed from 8 patients and analyzed. Video confirmed attachment of 13 of the 25 stones with the remainder believed to have been accidently dislodged during the procedure. Microscopic examination by light and computerized tomography failed to show evidence of Randall's plaque associated with any stone containing brushite. Conversely each brushite stone demonstrated microstructural evidence of having grown attached to a ductal plug formed of apatite.

conclusionsThree-dimensional analysis of small brushite stones suggests overgrowth on ductal apatite plugs as a mechanism of early stone growth and retention. Such findings represent what is to our knowledge the initial supporting evidence for a novel mechanism of stone formation which has previously been hypothesized but never verified.

Indexed as

ApatitesCalcium PhosphatesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousTomography, X-Ray ComputedUreteroscopyApatitescalcium phosphate, dibasic, dihydrateCalcium Phosphatescalcium phosphatecollectingdibasicdihydrateetiologykidney calculikidney tubulestomographyx-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID28822796
PMCPMC5871923
OpenAlexW2604665816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.