Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28822238›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017

The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern.

Ami R Zota, Bhavna Shamasunder

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07216898 (You Have the Right to Know), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07216898 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

You Have the Right to Know: Empowering Women Through Clean Beauty Research and Education

TypeobservationalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled38ConditionsHealth Disparities, EducationArmsChemical Exposure Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 246 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mercury in skin lightening and skin care products purchased in New York City, 2009-2022.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analyzing the landscape of "clean" products for textured hair at a Los Angeles Target.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ami R ZotaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington DC. Electronic address: azota@gwu.edu.
Bhavna ShamasunderUrban and Environmental Policy Department, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA.
Milken Institute · USOccidental College · US

Funding

Role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and social stress on perinatal outcomesR00ES019881 · NIEHS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZOTA, AMI R · 2013 to 2015
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES019881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obstetrics-gynecology community has issued a call to action to prevent toxic environmental chemical exposures and their threats to healthy human reproduction. Recent committee opinions recognize that vulnerable and underserved women may be impacted disproportionately by environmental chemical exposures and recommend that reproductive health professionals champion policies that secure environmental justice. Beauty product use is an understudied source of environmental chemical exposures. Beauty products can include reproductive and developmental toxicants such as phthalates and heavy metals; however, disclosure requirements are limited and inconsistent. Compared with white women, women of color have higher levels of beauty product-related environmental chemicals in their bodies, independent of socioeconomic status. Even small exposures to toxic chemicals during critical periods of development (such as pregnancy) can trigger adverse health consequences (such as impacts on fertility and pregnancy, neurodevelopment, and cancer). In this commentary, we seek to highlight the connections between environmental justice and beauty product-related chemical exposures. We describe racial/ethnic differences in beauty product use (such as skin lighteners, hair straighteners, and feminine hygiene products) and the potential chemical exposures and health risks that are associated with these products. We also discuss how targeted advertising can take advantage of mainstream beauty norms to influence the use of these products. Reproductive health professionals can use this information to advance environmental justice by being prepared to counsel patients who have questions about toxic environmental exposures from beauty care products and other sources. Researchers and healthcare providers can also promote health-protective policies such as improved ingredient testing and disclosure for the beauty product industry. Future clinical and public health research should consider beauty product use as a factor that may shape health inequities in women's reproductive health across the life course.

Indexed as

CarcinogensCosmeticsEndocrine System DiseasesFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTeratogensWomen's HealthCarcinogensCosmeticsTeratogenscosmeticsendocrine-disrupting chemicalsenvironmental justicehealth disparitytoxic environmental chemicals

Identifiers

PMID28822238
PMCPMC5614862
OpenAlexW2748494356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.