Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28822109›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2018

Consumer attitudes towards the establishment of a national Australian familial cancer research database by the Inherited Cancer Connect (ICCon) Partnership.

Laura Forrest, Gillian Mitchell, Letitia Thrupp, Lara Petelin, Kate Richardson, Lyon Mascarenhas, Mary-Anne Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Hereditary Endocrine Tumor Registries.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Dynamic consent and personalised medicine.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura ForrestParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. laura.forrest@petermac.org.
Gillian MitchellParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Letitia ThruppParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Lara PetelinParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Kate RichardsonParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Lyon MascarenhasParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Mary-Anne YoungParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Council New South Wales Strategic Research Partnership (STREP) scheme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical genetics units hold large amounts of information which could be utilised to benefit patients and their families. In Australia, a national research database, the Inherited Cancer Connect (ICCon) database, is being established that comprises clinical genetic data held for all carriers of mutations in cancer predisposition genes. Consumer input was sought to establish the acceptability of the inclusion of clinical genetic data into a research database. A qualitative approach using a modified nominal group technique was used to collect data through consumer forums conducted in three Australian states. Individuals who had previously received care from Familial Cancer Centres were invited to participate. Twenty-four consumers participated in three forums. Participants expressed positive attitudes about the establishment of the ICCon database, which were informed by the perceived benefits of the database including improved health outcomes for individuals with inherited cancer syndromes. Most participants were comfortable to waive consent for their clinical information to be included in the research database in a de-identified format. As major stakeholders, consumers have an integral role in contributing to the development and conduct of the ICCon database. As an initial step in the development of the ICCon database, the forums demonstrated consumers' acceptance of important aspects of the database including waiver of consent.

Indexed as

ConsumerDatabaseInherited cancerResearch

Identifiers

PMID28822109
PMCPMC5752654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.