Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28821539›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2017

What Motivates Biology Instructors to Engage and Persist in Teaching Professional Development?

Jill S McCourt, Tessa C Andrews, Jennifer K Knight, John E Merrill, Ross H Nehm, Karen N Pelletreau, Luanna B Prevost, Michelle K Smith, Mark Urban-Lurain, Paula P Lemons

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jill S McCourtDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Tessa C AndrewsDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Jennifer K KnightDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
John E MerrillDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Ross H NehmDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University (SUNY), Stony Brook, NY 11794.
Karen N PelletreauSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469.
Luanna B PrevostDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620.
Michelle K SmithSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469.
Mark Urban-LurainCollege of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Paula P LemonsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 plemons@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Maine · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a study of 19 biology instructors participating in small, local groups at six research-intensive universities connected to the Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) project (www.msu.edu/∼aacr). Our aim was to uncover participants' motivation to persist in a long-term teaching professional development effort, a topic that is understudied in discipline-based educational research. We interviewed each participant twice over a 2-year period and conducted qualitative analyses on the data, using expectancy-value theory as a framework for considering motivation. Our analyses revealed that motivation among instructors was high due to their enjoyment of the AACR groups. The high level of motivation is further explained by the fact that AACR groups facilitated instructor involvement with the larger AACR project. We also found that group dynamics encouraged persistence; instructors thought they might never talk with colleagues about teaching in the absence of AACR groups; and groups were perceived to have a low-enough time requirement to warrant sustained involvement

Indexed as

FacultyMotivationTeachingBiologyHumansPerceptionUniversities

Identifiers

PMID28821539
PMCPMC5589434
OpenAlexW2748806046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.