Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28821530›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

WHISPER or SHOUT study: protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial assessing mHealth sexual reproductive health and nutrition interventions among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya.

Frances H Ampt, Collins Mudogo, Peter Gichangi, Megan S C Lim, Griffins Manguro, Matthew Chersich, Walter Jaoko, Marleen Temmerman, Marilyn Laini, Liz Comrie-Thomson and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Frances H AmptBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Collins MudogoInternational Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Mombasa, Kenya.
Peter GichangiInternational Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Mombasa, Kenya.
Megan S C LimBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Griffins ManguroInternational Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Mombasa, Kenya.
Matthew ChersichWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Walter JaokoUniversity of Nairobi, Mombasa, Kenya.
Marleen TemmermanInternational Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Mombasa, Kenya.
Marilyn LainiInternational Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Mombasa, Kenya.
Liz Comrie-ThomsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark StoovéBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul A AgiusBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Margaret HellardBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Kelly L'EngleUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stanley LuchtersBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya · KEMonash University · AUTechnical University of Mombasa · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of San Francisco · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew interventions are required to reduce unintended pregnancies among female sex workers (FSWs) in low- and middle-income countries and to improve their nutritional health. Given sex workers' high mobile phone usage, repeated exposure to short messaging service (SMS) messages could address individual and interpersonal barriers to contraceptive uptake and better nutrition.

methodsIn this two-arm cluster randomised trial, each arm constitutes an equal-attention control group for the other. SMS messages were developed systematically, participatory and theory-driven and cover either sexual and reproductive health (WHISPER) or nutrition (SHOUT). Messages are sent to participants 2-3 times/week for 12 months and include fact-based and motivational content as well as role model stories. Participants can send reply texts to obtain additional information. Sex work venues (clusters) in Mombasa, Kenya, were randomly sampled with a probability proportionate to venue size. Up to 10 women were recruited from each venue to enrol 860 women. FSWs aged 16-35 years, who owned a mobile phone and were not pregnant at enrolment were eligible. Structured questionnaires, pregnancy tests, HIV and syphilis rapid tests and full blood counts were performed at enrolment, with subsequent visits at 6 and 12 months. ANALYSIS: The primary outcomes of WHISPER and SHOUT are unintended pregnancy incidence and prevalence of anaemia at 12 months, respectively. Each will be compared between study groups using discrete-time survival analysis. POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS: Contamination may occur if participants discuss their intervention with those in the other trial arm. This is mitigated by cluster recruitment and only sampling a small proportion of sex work venues from the sampling frame.

conclusionsThe design allows for the simultaneous testing of two independent mHealth interventions for which messaging frequency and study procedures are identical. This trial may guide future mHealth initiatives and provide methodological insights into use of reciprocal control groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000852459; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedReproductive BehaviorSexual HealthSex WorkText MessagingAdolescentAdultAnemiaCell PhoneDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth EducationHumansKenyaMotivationAnaemiaCommunity GynaecologyInternational Health ServicesPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID28821530
PMCPMC5724193
OpenAlexW2750353462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.